Saturday, February 28, 2026

PARRYs at the Battle of Trafalgar

Back in October, I mentioned that two of the new databases on FindMyPast were the "British Royal Navy, Battle Of Trafalgar 1805and the "British Royal Navy, Battle Of Trafalgar Prize Book", and I made it one of my intentions for this year, to follow these up in more detail. 

So that is what I have been working on recently.

It has been an interesting change (and challenge!) from what I sometimes do - I think most guides to genealogical good practice will suggest, somewhere, that it is important to understand the records you are dealing with, to know what date periods they cover, and whether any dates are missing, to know how reliable the information in them is, whether it is a 'primary' source, or composed from other sources. etc.  

But I often find myself just 'collecting' the PARRYs, without investigating such details.    

Of course, the intention is there, to process and understand the information more fully, in order to add it into the study 'properly' in the future.  But it can be quite time consuming to read all about a dataset before doing any work on it (especially if a quick initial search only shows a limited number of results).  

Most of us, I imagine, have to balance the time and effort required, against the potential results achieved, when carrying out our studies.

But it has felt quite rewarding to investigate these in more detail (even if I have tackled things 'backwards'!)

Starting point - collecting the information.
As I mentioned in October, the two datasets contain eight and six PARRY entries, respectively.  It was immediately apparent that some of the men were listed in both datasets, and that the prize book only contained three men, who were all listed twice.  

This latter point was intriguing, so I decided to look at that dataset first, especially since images of the original records were available.  Each page in the book(s) lists up to seventeen names and, for each man, gave their number, name, quality (ie rank), the sum they were paid, the date of payment, to whom the money was paid, and a witness' initial.  

The "to whom paid" column might occasionally be useful for researchers. However, the majority of payments just had "his X mark" entered.  The writing of these was all very regular, as if written by the same person, and often bracketed in small groups with just one witness initial.  The dates of payments are also not consecutive. Which all makes me wonder about the process of production for the books, but I haven't looked into that in detail.   

And none of that helped to explain why there were two entries for each man.

I backtracked though the images, to look for an 'explanation', initially stopping at the first page for each ship, and then back to the beginning of the book(s) to see what was written there.  By this time, I had realised that there were two sequences of images, relating to two separate books.  Although the text was very similar, there were differences - which I'd have appreciated earlier, if I had looked at the transcription pages on FindMyPast where, although the record set is described as "Battle Of Trafalgar Prize Book", the descriptions varied between "Trafalgar Prize Money" and "Trafalgar Parliamentary Grant".

The search page1 gives some more information, explaining how ships captured by the Royal Navy would be sold and the profits divided among the crew.  While this might have been an incentive for some to join the navy, and it could be lucrative, there was no guarantee of success - even if a battle was won, and enemy ships captured, the ships might be lost before they could be brought back to Britain and sold.

And this is what happened, following the Battle of Trafalgar.  

The battle had taken place on the 21 October 1805, when 27 British ships met a combined French and Spanish fleet of 33 ships.  Thanks to Admiral Nelson's tactics, it seems 18 enemy ships were either destroyed or captured, while the British didn't lose any ships.  However, reading the account on Wikipedia,2 it seems that, following the initial battle, there were attempts by the French and Spanish to retake some of their ships, which resulted in British sailors becoming prisoners. Both sides were also affected by the weather and, in the end, only four of the "prize ships" were brought back to Britain.

It seems, normally, that would be it. Ships lost = no prize money. 

But, because of the scale and importance of the victory, Parliament then awarded a grant of £300,000, to be divided among the sailors in the same way that the prize money would have been.  

Hence, there are the two books, one recording the distribution of the prize money from the four ships that were successfully brought back, the other recording the distribution of the Parliamentary grant.

FindMyPast indicates that the two prize books are in the National Museum of the Royal Navy, which is in Portsmouth.3 Their catalogue doesn't seem to be available at the moment, and I haven't been able to find the books listed in the National Archives catalogue either.  However, I did find what appear to be the relevant descriptions on the forum of the Society for Nautical research, which indicates the books are "RNM Naval Trophy/1983/1062/1 Trafalgar Awards List", and "RNM Naval Trophy/1983/1062/2 Trafalgar Awards List Supplementary Award granted by Parliament".4 It appears the Parliamentary Grant was issued first, in 1806, and the Prize Money was issued in 1807. 

Looking at the images on FindMyPast, each book contains a note from someone who, I assume, had possession of them before they went into the archive.  In the "Trafalgar Parliamentary Grant" book (FMP series containing 331 images), it says:

"A most valuable & interesting record of the various amounts that were paid out of £300,000 which Parliament voted as grants to the crews of all the ships that had taken part in the Great Battle of Trafalgar: - every officer, seaman & marine being apportioned a sum according to his rank & standing. The Grants were paid by a firm of London Bankers (now non existent) & an acknowledgement given either by the recipient himself or his legal representative (or heirs in the case of those who were killed) - as herein recorded."

The note in the "Prize Money" book (FMP series containing 287 images) is very similar, as might be expected - but the final paragraph sheds more light on the history of the records!:

"An extremely valuable and interesting record of the various sums of money that were awarded as Prize-money to the crews of all the ships that had taken part in the capture and destruction of the French and Spanish fleets at Trafalgar:- every officer, seaman & marine being apportioned an amount according to his rank & standing. The money was paid by a firm of Bankers in London (now non-existent) & an acknowledgement given either by the recipients themselves or their legal representatives as herein recorded.
The "Neptune" list was unfortunately stolen before the Book came into my possession: all the others are complete."

The comment about "all" the others being complete needs to be understood in the context of what was included to start with.  The information page on FindMyPast states "These books only cover ship names P-V. Unfortunately, it is not known what happened to the volumes for ships A-O.

That isn't strictly correct, in that the Index at the start of each book lists the following ships:

Neptune
Orion
Polyphemus
Prince
Revenge
Royal Sovereign
Spartiate
Swiftsure
Temeraire
Tonnant
Thunderer
Victory
Euryalus
Naiad
Phoebe
Sirius
Pickle
Entreprenante


So, as you can see, a couple of ships beginning with "E" are included.

At the start of each ship's entry, more detail is included regarding what the men were signing for.  For the Parliamentary Grant this generally states:

"We whose Names & Marks are hereunto subscribed being the Captain Officers & Company of His Majesty's Ship {ship name} under the Command of the late Rt Hon. Lord Nelson in the Battle off Cape Trafalgar on the 21 October 1805 do acknowledge to have received by ourselves or our legal representatives thro' the hands of Messrs C(hristopher) Cooke & J(ames) Halford for & on acct of the Rt Hon. Lord Howick, John Earl Spencer & Lord Henry Petty Trustees for the Distribution of £300,000 voted by Parliament, the several sums expressed against our Names being our respective Proportions of the said Grant.
And we do hereby discharge our said Trustees as well as the said Messrs Cooke & Halford from any further demand on account thereof"

(There are some minor variations, such as having "the amount of our proportions of the said Grant" instead of " our respective Proportions of the said Grant" etc.)

In the Prize Book, the text is similar. However, the Bankers are Messrs Christopher Cooke & William Rd Cosway and the money received is described as "being the amount of our respective proportions of the proceeds of 4 French & Spanish ships captured on that day together with proceeds of Bounty Bills for the Enemy's ships destroyed."

Some more background - and resolving some potential confusion
While researching, I was interested to find that the "British Naval Biographical Dictionary, 1849", which is on Ancestry, includes a list of "General Actions" between 1794 - 1840, as well as tables showing the returns of numbers killed and wounded at each.  Based on the return for the Battle of Trafalgar, it appears that the following will be the ships where the prize money records have been lost:

Britannia
Dreadnought
Mars
Bellerophon
Minotaur
Conqueror
Leviathan
Ajax
Agememnon
Africa
Belleisle
Colossus
Achille
Defence
Defiance

This did cause me some initial confusion - because there are twenty seven ships in that table (which agrees with the number said to be at the battle). 

However, six of the ships in the prize books do not appear in the table, ie Euryalus, Naiad, Phoebe, Sirius, Pickle, and Entreprenante.

Thanks to the Nelson Society, who have published a pdf entitled "The Trafalgar Roll",5 I discovered that four of these six ships (Euryalus, Naiad, Phoebe, and Sirius), were frigates, which were too small to be actively engaged in the battle, although the Euryalus is mentioned as performing "valuable service" during the battle by making signals after one of the larger ships was disabled.

From Wikipedia, it appears the other two ships, Pickle and Entreprenante, were also both present but, again, were too small to take part in the fighting, although they were involved in rescuing sailors during the battle. Pickle also carried news of Nelson's death, and of the victory in the battle, back to Britain.6

I had another confusing moment when I found the Phoebe described as assisting two of the "prizes", one of which was called Swiftsure, ie the name of one of the ships on the British side during the Battle of Trafalgar.7
  
It turned out that there were two such ships in the battle - one on the British side, the other, originally British, but captured by the French in 1801, and so fighting on the French side!8

So, although only 27 British ships were engaged in the fighting, more ships were present in the area and were involved in other aspects of what took place.

Moving on to the PARRYs, and research into who they were 
Although the prize books currently only appear on FindMyPast, the other database on the site, 
"British Royal Navy, Battle Of Trafalgar 1805" seems to be the same as the "England, Battle of Trafalgar Crew Lists, 1805-1806" on Ancestry.  And the source for both is the "Trafalgar Ancestors" database at the TNA.9

The information on each site varies slightly. For example, searching for "Parry" on both Ancestry and FindMyPast produces eight results, but only seven on the National Archives site.  It's easy to spot the cause - one of the entries on FindMyPast has a question mark after the surname. This entry appears without the "?" on Ancestry, but is only found on the TNA site by searching for "Parry?

So it seems worth checking all three sites, if possible, not just to pick up any such spelling variations, but also some of the additional comments, which don't seem to be included on both the genealogical sites.  

The TNA database is also described as an ongoing project so, potentially, more information will become available in the future.  Most of the men only have one source listed - the ships muster list or pay book covering around (but not always including) the date of the Battle of Trafalgar.  Since muster lists for other date periods exist in the TNA, anyone interested in a particular person could potentially find out more about their service etc, through those records.

Looking at what I have discovered, so far, for each PARRY in turn: 

In 1805, Andrew was a midshipman on HMS Britannia, one of the ships not included in the prize books. He was aged 20, and born in London. There is a comment, which states "see former books", so more information on him should be available in the navy records.

I found four references in the TNA to an Andrew PARRY connected with the navy:
- In January 1803, in a letter to the captain of HMS Ethalion, Sheerness, a midshipman Andrew PARRY asks to be discharged because of his wounds, and the Captain passes the letter on, asking that the request be complied with. (ADM 1/2509/103)
-  In July 1811, there's a request submitted from HMS Ulysses, for "a Lieutenant senior to Andrew Parry, whose seniority dates from September 18, 1809, as Lt Parry has just joined the ship from half pay, having been obliged to give up his previous appointment because of deafness." (ADM 1/1550/169)
-  In September 1811, a similar request to the above, this time specifically asking that a Lieutenant Lauzen be "appointed to HMS Ulysses in place of Lieutenant Andrew Parry." (ADM 1/1551/60)
-  In December 1813, the "Will of Andrew Parry, Lieutenant in the Royal Navy of Brockhurst, Hampshire" is proved in the PCC (PROB 11/1550/474)

 I suspect that the 1803 reference might relate to a different Andrew Parry - although he is a midshipman, if his wounds were such that he was unable to carry out his duties at that time, and his Captain agreed, is it likely that he would still be serving over two years later, at the Battle of Trafalgar, yet alone potentially progressing further to become a Lieutenant?   [A Lieutenant was the next rank up from a midshipman, but required passing an exam.10]

Ancestry has a database of the "Commissioned Sea Officers of the Royal Navy, 1660-1815", which shows an Andrew PARRY becoming a Lieutenant on the 18 September 1809.  

This matches to the July 1811 entry in the TNA. Perhaps the 'deafness' could have been caused during the battle of Trafalgar?

Tieing in with the probate entry, a Lieutenant Andrew PARRY is buried at Alverstoke, Hampshire on the 16th December 1813.  He was aged 28, which matches to a birthdate of 1785, and would make him 20 in 1805.  The address at burial was given as "Hardway", which is a hamlet in the parish of Alverstoke. "Brockhurst", the address in the probate entry, is another hamlet in the same area.11

 In the Will, Andrew mentions his wife, Isabella, his brother, Henry, and his father - who he doesn't name but who is described as "Andrew Parry, gent" when the Will is proved.

An Andrew PARRY married an Isabella EMLEY in Alverstoke in 1813. There are three different dates shown for the marriage on FindMyPast (1st February, 5th July, and 6th July.) Ancestry just shows 6th July 1813.  Neither of the sites have images for the marriage, so I haven't been able to confirm any of the details.  However, Ancestry does also have the Pallot's Marriage Index, which indicates that this Andrew was a Lieutenant in the RN.

So several of these entries do seem to match up, indicating that the Andrew PARRY, who was present at the battle of Trafalgar, potentially became a Lieutenant in 1809, married in 1813, and then died later that year.

It is also possible that his father was an "Andrew PARRY, gentleman of Southwark", whose Will was proved in 1815. However, I haven't yet found a suitable baptism for Andrew junior. 

In 1805, Howard was serving as a "boy" on HMS Tonnant, aged 14, and is described as born in Chatham, Kent.  He is listed in the prize books.

He is also the one entry that I have found a reasonable quantity of information for and, since I am running out of time to get this posted before the end of the month, I am going to write Howard's information up as a separate post, next month. 

James was an ordinary seaman ("able seaman" in the FMP Index), serving on HMS Ajax, in 1805.  He was aged 26, and described as born in "Cultarton, Devon", a parish that doesn't seem to exist!  
I haven't been able to confirm any other records as even potentially relating to him, and the Ajax is one of the ships not listed in the prize books.

The dates quoted on his page show "1 March 1805 to 1 June 1805", with an additional "2 June 1805" not connected to any information. However, the linked source seems to be for dates "1805 Aug - 1806 Jan".  Also, there is a comment stating, "see former books", so more information on James is probably available in the navy records.

John was another 14 year old "boy", this time serving on HMS Royal Sovereign in 1805.  The comments described him as "late Gladiator".  The ship called HMS Gladiator, at that date, seems to have been permanently on harbour service.12 The information about John in the Trafalgar database is said to have come from the Marine Society, whose historical records are held at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich.13 [Searching for PARRY in their catalogue returns a large number of entries, so I haven't explored that further.]

In the prize books, John received £4 12s 6d on 27 Oct 1806, from the Parliamentary Grant, and £1 17s 6d,  on 23 Aug 1807, from the prize money.  On both occasions, the receipt was acknowledge by his mark.

John was from Worcester, in Worcestershire. There are several baptisms for John PARRYs in, and near, Worcester around 1791, so more information would be needed to identify a relevant baptism.

However, it is possible he was admitted to the Greenwich Hospital pensioners in 1847.  Entries in the "Entry Book of Pensioners", and the "Rough Entry Book of Pensioners", within the database "British Royal Navy & Royal Marines Service And Pension Records, 1704-1939" on FindMyPast, show a John PARRY, aged 58, being admitted on the 2nd December 1847. He had been a seaman, but his trade was now described as a labourer.  His last ship had been the Monarch.  Described as born in Worcester, his last residence was recorded as Chelsea, and he had a ticket number of 712, which I believe indicates that he had previously been receiving a pension while living independently (ie not in the Royal Hospital at Greenwich). He was married to a Mary, with three children under twelve, a boy and two girls, and he had lost a finger.  He was supplied with his "first clothing" on the 3rd December, and his "second clothing" on the 14th April, which, I imagine, refer to the distinctive coats worn by the hospital pensioners.

Based on the ticket number, it is also possible to find three entries that might be of relevance for John, on Ancestry, in the "UK, Royal Hospital Chelsea Returns of Payment of Army and Other Pensions, 1842-1883". The first is a pensioner being transferred from the 2nd West London district. He was in receipt of a permanent pension, was "Admitted In Pensioner per War Office letter 6/12(?)/47", and he had been paid his pension up until the 2nd December prior to being transferred.  That would seem to tie in with the admission record on FindMyPast.

The second entry shows a John PARRY under the section headed "Pensioners newly admitted to out-pension", with the 18th March 1855 being the date the pension starts being paid by the 2nd West London district.  If this was John being transferred back out of the hospital, one wonders why he wasn't listed under the section "Pensioners transferred to the District" instead, since he had previously been receiving a pension. 

 The third entry shows a John PARRY under the section of "Pensioners transferred from the District", with an "Admission to Out-Pension" date of 15 March 1855, being transferred to Deptford, with his pension paid up to 31st October 1860. 

Clearly more work is required to match up all these records properly, but it shows there is potential for discovering more.

In the 1841 census, there is a John PARRY, aged 45, a labourer, who was not born in the county, with a wife, Mary, and daughter, Betsey, aged 10, living in St Luke, Chelsea (HO107/688/6/7) which is a 'possibility' for John. I haven't been able to find any other census entries or a death/burial record for him.   

This John was a private in the marines, serving on HMS Victory. He is shown as aged 25, but his birth year is calculated as 1778 by Ancestry and FindMyPast, since that has been calculated from 1803, the start date for the particular pay book the information comes from. This book is available for download from the TNA site (ADM 36/15900) and consists of multiple sections, with John PARRY's name appearing in several of them. So there is more to be learnt about him.  

On the TNA site, he is described as being at Trafalgar.  There are two comments for him, the first, "from Chatham HQ", the second "Discharged 15 Jan 1806 Chatham Headquarters HMS Victory paid off."

The prize books show him receiving £4 12s 6d, on the 18th Nov 1806, as his portion from the Parliamentary Grant, and £1 17s 6d, on the 3rd Oct 1807, from the prize money.

John is said to be born in Chirk, Shropshire. Shropshire is an area where the PARRY surname occurs fairly frequently, so I think more information on him from naval records would be needed, before many other records can be identified.  It is possible he appears on Ancestry, in the "Royal Hospital Chelsea Returns of Payment of Army and Other Pensions, 1842-1883" since there is a John PARRY, born about 1776, who served in the 1st Division RM, received a permanent Out-Pension from 15 August 1816, and then died on the 15th January 1855, aged 79.  

Richard was another private in the marines, this time serving on HMS Ajax.  There's no age or birthplace given for him, and the Ajax is one of the ships that isn't listed in the prize books.  

I think the initial route to finding any additional information on him will be to follow the comment on the TNA page, which says to "see former books". 

Robert was an able seaman, serving on HMS Achille in 1805, aged 34.  He had previously served on HMS Renown. His birthplace is described as "Hollowell, Wales", which, I imagine, should be Holywell, in Flintshire.  

He is the only one of the eight PARRYs in the database that has a death date noted - he died at sea, on the 7 June 1807.  However, there is no indication where the death information came from, so further research is needed on that.

This John was 21, a midshipman serving on HMS Minotaur. Since the Minotaur isn't one of the ships in the prize books, I've not been able to check the surname in any images.

John is described as born in Portsmouth. 

Additional Finds
During the course of researching this man, I came across two marriages relating to sailors:
On 23 Jan 1800, a John PARRY, of HMS Achille, married an Ann MIALL, in Portsea, St Marys
On 27 Mar 1813, a John PARRY, Royal Marine, married a Maria LEE, in Portsmouth, St Thomas.

Neither of these can be conclusively matched up to any of the above entries, but I have included them here, in case the information helps anyone else researching the Royal Navy seamen.

So there we are, a post about (most of) the PARRYs who served in the Battle of Trafalgar, just scraping in as my monthly post for February. Phew!


Notes and Sources

2. Wikipedia account of the Battle of Trafalgar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Trafalgar

3. National Museum of the Royal Navy: https://www.nmrn.org.uk/

4. The Society for Nautical research Forum query regarding the Prize Books: https://snr.org.uk/snr-forum/topic/trafalgar-prize-money-and-300000-l-special-award-payment-details/

5. The Nelson Society pdf "The Trafalgar Roll"https://www.nelson-society.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/TheBattleOfTrafalgar.pdf

6. Wikipedia re the two ships Entrepante and Pickle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Entreprenante and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Pickle_(1800) 

7. Phoebe assisting a prize called Swiftsure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Phoebe_(1795)

8. The earlier British ship called Swiftsure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Swiftsure_(1787)

9. The "Trafalgar Ancestors" database at the TNA:  https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/trafalgarancestors/

10. A Lieutenant being the next rank up from a midshipman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Navy_ranks,_rates,_and_uniforms_of_the_18th_and_19th_centuries#/media/File:NormalEntryCommissionRoute.png and  https://19thcentury.us/19th-century-royal-navy-ranks/ 

11. "Hardway" and "Brockhurst" being hamlets in the parish of Alverstoke: https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/hants/vol3/pp202-208  and https://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/HAM/Alverstoke

12. HMS Gladiator on harbour service: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Gladiator

13. The Marine Society, and their historical records at Greenwich: https://www.marine-society.org/history and https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/archive/search/parry




















Saturday, January 24, 2026

January 2026: Company totals, tracking numbers, and future plans.

 In some ways, this is a follow-on from my post in October last year, when I wrote about getting back into systematically collecting information for the study, and about tracking the numbers of PARRY entries within the genealogical company databases.  The idea behind doing that is to (eventually!) be able to identify how 'complete' the study is, through some quantifiable measure.

Of course, I will never be able to collect every reference - an exact search for the surname in each of the main genealogical sites currently produces the following total numbers:

Ancestry: 3,211,449

FindMyPast: 1,303,026

My Heritage: 7,725,522

TheGenealogist: 640,550

Family Search: 1,044,594

(and there's 3,965 PARRY related profiles on Wikitree.)

 I have spent some time this month looking at how easy it might be to keep track of totals in the various databases but the simple answer, for anyone who likes 'exact' figures, is that it isn't!

Ancestry is the easiest to collect totals from - but the totals for individual databases within each category (eg "All BMD...", "All census...", "All military..." etc) don't always add up to the overall total given for that category to start with. Some databases also seem to 'disappear' when you click through to see them all, as illustrated in the following two smaller sets of results, in which I was searching using an additional exact keyword of "navy", as well as the exact surname:

where "See All" led to just the RNLI records:


and:

where "See All" just led to the Wills: 


Imagine trying to identify which databases are 'missing', if you found such differences having collected totals from over seven thousand databases.

The other companies either do not show the individual database totals, or only do so if you click down through various levels for any that contain above a certain number of results. 

And, again, the totals obtained by adding the results for individual areas (ie, on FMP, the separate "Australia & New Zealand", "Ireland", "All Britain", and "All US & Canada" totals) does not always add up to the same total as when you search under "The World".  Even the total obtained when searching just the two countries, Canada and the United States, separately, isn't the same as when searching for them both together, yet alone the total obtained when searching under the five separate regions of Britain, compared to an "All Britain" search.

I'm sure there are reasons behind why that happens. 

But there is clearly little point trying to measure 'completeness' based on such general numbers of entries (although it can be interesting to look at the lists of individual databases available - discovering there are entries in databases such as the "Mayflower Source Records", various Mexican Catholic records, or the "Mariners of the American Revolution", can lead into totally unexpected areas of research.)

And, while it might be fun to produce graphs like this:


or this:


...they're not exactly informative, other than to demonstrate the fairly obvious conclusion that a few databases have large numbers of PARRY entries, while the majority of databases contain a relatively small number of entries (and that the "Wales, Newspapers.com™ Stories and Events Index, 1800's to current" certainly skews the results! ☺)

 Such graphs are not very helpful in terms of developing a strategy for progress on the study.

Of more use might be a graph limited to a particular category of results, such as the census results, within the UK and Ireland Collection:


Once again, summarising the number of databases containing the various totals shows how the majority of the databases contain relatively small numbers of results (less than 2501, according to the scale but, in reality, all less than 150 entries), about a third of the databases contain between  2501 - 17501 entries, and only one database (the 1939 Register, where totals for the UK's constituent regions are not given separately), approaches 30,000.


Now, from such figures, it is much easier to plan a 'collection strategy', and to identify which databases will need subdividing further, to make the process more manageable.  It will also be possible to measure against the totals expected, to obtain some level of 'completeness'.

I know that many one-namers base their studies around marriage records but, for me, the censuses have always seemed a 'better' choice.  They give a snapshot of which PARRYs were alive at a particular moment in time and that provides a framework on which to hang all the other data.  

So census details are going to be a focus for progress over this year.

But, since I imagine just working on the censuses, and reciting statistics for how many more census entries I have transcribed each month, will drive me (yet alone any readers) slightly 'nuts', I shall also be working on other topics alongside that. Recalling the list of topics I included in my December post, the first one of these will be the PARRYs at the Battle of Trafalgar.  

I have already begun to look at these but will make that a separate post.

I might expand that topic to include other records of PARRYs in the UK's Royal Navy - bearing in mind that the forthcoming Guild Conference will take place in Portsmouth, the site of "one of the Royal Navy’s most historically significant bases".1

Talking of the Guild, last week, I was reading the most recent Guild Journal, in particular the article by Stephen Coker, about Frederick Norman Filby (1915-1995), who was described as the "Architect of the One-Name Study Movement".  It really made me aware of how much we, as current one-namers, "stand upon the shoulders of giants", those who accomplished so much, and who laid down the foundations for what we do now.

In three years time, 2029 will see the Guild's 50th anniversary - now that's a good target to aim for, to see some major progress in the study.


Notes & Sources 

1 The historical significance of Portsmouth: specific quote from the "Overview of UK Royal Navy Bases" at https://www.defenseadvancement.com/resources/royal-navy-bases/

National Museum of the Royal Navy at Portsmouth Historic Dockyard: https://www.nmrn.org.uk/visit-us/portsmouth-historic-dockyard



 



Wednesday, December 31, 2025

A review of this year

It's that time of year again, when many of us look back at what we have achieved over the last twelve months and then forward to all we hope to achieve during the next twelve.

On the Blog
At the beginning of 2025, I reviewed my attempt at the "Guild Blog Challenge 2024" and, from that, made a pact with myself that I would continue to try to write at least one post here each month.  I didn't manage to do that every month, missing out on posting in July.  However, both June and August (as well as January) contained two posts so, overall, including this one, I will have made fourteen posts.  

While that's not 'perfect', it means I have maintained a reasonable level of publication, which I hope to continue into next year. Making a pact with myself, like that, does help to deal with any 'motivation' issues.

Another intention derived from my review of the Guild Challenge was to create a list of "potential blog topics" - I didn't manage to go through all of the past Guild Blog Challenges to collect the topics from those, or to take a look at some of the other series one-namers have created, or followed.1 However, I did manage to find the themes for several years of Amy Johnson Crow's "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks" challenges2 and created an excel file containing those.  

Although I initially started to combine all of the years' topics into one list, to which I intended to add suggestions for ways the topics could be interpreted by a one-namer, I've ended up deciding against that additional process.  Amy's intention, as stated in her 2015 post, was that the themes were 'general — one might even say “ambiguous.”' This was quite deliberate, since her aim was "to inspire, rather than dictate."  

Given the wide range of One-Name Studies - not just because of the different frequencies of the surnames, and the locations where the surnames predominate, but also in the methods used by individual one-namers - I don't think the extra process is necessary.  Bearing in mind that one-namers generally have some advantages over those who are only researching their own ancestry, because:
- a one-name study tends to include a larger number of individuals, than a personal family history,
- and, potentially, those individuals will have a wider variety of backgrounds, and circumstances in their lives - there's more options to choose from to fit particular topics.

- A one-name study also undertakes to develop the research beyond just the individuals, by synthesising the data into conclusions about the surname itself etc, so that produces even more options for interpreting a topic, by writing about methodology, or results, etc.

So I think most one-namers should be able find a way of interpreting the topics to fit their own study, if they want to follow a 'topic based' method for publication. So I have just included links to where I found the lists in the 'Notes & Sources' below.

Rather than writing about particular topics, an alternative approach is to write about whatever research is currently being carried out - when I began my blog, I said it was intended to provide a record of all the ongoing "happenings" in the study, ie "contacts being made, new resources found, links discovered, and general ongoing development, etc.

So, really, as long as I am working on the study, I should have something to write about! (In hindsight, maybe that statement does explain some of the periods without posts! )

My "fall back" option for a post, which is to take a look at the most recent updates from any (or all!) of whichever genealogical companies I happen to have a subscription to, and comment on entries for my surname (or the lack of such entries.) is nicely covered by the inclusion of "new resources found," in the above description of the purpose of the blog.

So subject matter for posts here really shouldn't be an issue!

However, I have identified two particular aspects of blogging that I need to work on, and will possibly be looking for feedback on, over the coming year.

Firstly, dealing with whether I know enough on a topic to write about it.  Doubts about this were why my attempts at following the "52 ancestors in 52 weeks" challenge with my own family history failed in both 2018 and 2020.  It is so easy to keep on researching, looking for that one more piece of information, one more answer to a question, when one can still identify gaps in one's knowledge, rather than writing up what is already known.  I hope that, by reminding myself this is an 'ongoing' study, and that research does not always need to be 'finished' in order to be written up, I will make some progress with this.

The second aspect relates to *how* to write up the research.  

When I commented in September that the "Lloyd George Domesday Land Records" had reminded me about the family of PARRYs buried in Potton, and that their story would become the topic for October, I had not anticipated that it would take me until the end of November to 'finish' that post. The problem, apart from the sheer quantity of relevant references, and the time it took to make sense of some of them, was in deciding whether to write a 'family story', or the 'research story', ie a third person account of the family, or an account of my research into them.

Back in April, when writing about the Guild's Conference, I mentioned an emphasis on how 'every story matters', and the fact that "we're not just compiling names and dates etc (a habit it is easy to fall into, with a study of a relatively frequently occurring surname) but actually revealing the humanity of the people we write about, who they were, what they did and, where possible, the why of it, their hopes and their heartbreaks.  

So a 'family story' seems to be an ideal worth aiming for.

But I naturally tend towards writing the research story, because it's easier to write about what I have done, and the research I have carried out - and to include all the caveats about each of the records found, something that often seems to get overlooked in family stories.  (I often wonder how many 'fictional lives' appear in people's family trees, through inappropriate reconstruction of "facts" from records.)  

Another advantage to writing the research story, is that it can be written as the researcher carries out the research, rather than waiting until sufficient records have been traced in order to construct the family story. This saves on time and also the potential hassle of having to re-arrange all the records into the right order for the story. (No prizes for identifying how I know that!) 

But the question I kept asking myself, was, "which version would be the more interesting one to read?"

For a while, I considered writing up both versions and asking any readers to comment on which they preferred. In the end, I opted to try to write the family story first, since writing the blog is still a learning process for me and so it seemed important to try something 'different', even if I struggled with it. And now, having taken so long to write the post, I'm not sure I have the stamina to write up a research account (yet alone inflict reading it on anyone else, having seen how long the family story became!)

So the question (as to which version would be more interesting to read) still remains, and this is something I shall continue to consider, and work on, over this coming year.

Finally with regard to the blog, I imagine we all have more ideas about things we ‘could’ do on our studies, than the time that is available to do them. As part of my review of the year, I went through all three of my blogs and noted the items that I’d mentioned as requiring follow up - this ONS blog easily had the most!

I can't promise that the following are all going to become priorities for this coming year, but I am listing them here now, since it will be a measure of 'progress' to see how many of them have been achieved by the end of 2026. (The month in brackets is when I mentioned them during 2025 - not the month I am setting as a goal to do them!): 

Individuals or Families
Identifying the Thomas Parrye mentioned in the 1377 poll tax for Birdforth, North Yorkshire (January)
Research into the PARRYs mentioned on the post cards (and add the "Notes & Sources" to that post) (February)
The PARRY family in Walterstone (May)
My 2x great grandfather, Thomas PARRY (May)
The PARRYs from the Golden Vale (June)
Follow up regarding education records, and the Potton PARRYs (June, November)
Durham Home Guard enrolment forms (August)
Thomas PARRY's account book (August)
The PARRYs who served Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth I (August)
New Year gifts from PARRYs to Queen Elizabeth I (August)
PARRYs in the Postal Service Appointment Books (September)
Thomas PARRY in the Boer War (September)
PARRYs at the Battle of Trafalgar (October)

Mini Projects
Ireland (September)
Europe (October)
[Noting these has reminded me that I always said PARRYs in Dorset should be researched as a mini project, since many of the early entries relate to just one family.]  

Some wider ONS research topics
Why not every "son of Harry" became a "Parry" in Wales (January)
Census figures and distributions (March)
More follow up from Conference topics (e.g. internal migration, slave voyages, US 1950 census, and the issue of "every story matters") (April)
Recheck the "French register of deceased persons since 1970" (August)
Early pedigrees (August)
How to keep track of the numbers of PARRY entries (October)
PARRYs in Doncaster (October. Links to 'internal migration')
Genealogical research Directory (October)

The blog comments relating to several of the above items were linked to my 'currently defunct' website, and so highlight the need to update that and put the information online again. 

Changing subject slightly, I was interested to hear Paul Howes mention, at a recent talk to the Yorkshire Regional Meeting of the Guild, that he concentrates on family reconstruction. [I did think he also commented that he leaves others to deal with the 'stories' - but I can't find that reference now, so perhaps I imagined it! ]

There is no right, or wrong, way to carry out a one-name study - although there are some recommendations - many of the methods chosen depend, not only on the individual carrying out the study, but also on the surname being studied, its frequency, as well as its distribution around the world. 

But Paul's comment chimed with my current musings about publication on the blog, about organisation, and the tools used for recording the study, as well as the question of how I carry out the research, and what my focus is. 

So I have a lot to be working on for the coming year. But I am looking forward to it.  Having given up actively volunteering at a local historic house, I should have more time, and a better mindset, to make progress here, with the One-Name Study. 

So that's what I am anticipating for 2026! 

Happy New Year to All


[Postcard from "Alice" to Mr E T PARRY, of Swansea, sent 30 December 1913]


Notes and Sources

1. Julie Goucher's blog, which includes several examples of blog challenges: https://anglersrest.net/ 

2. Sources for topics from the "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks" challenges, organised by Amy Johnson Crow:
2014 - No themes, aim was just to write about one ancestor each week: https://www.nostorytoosmall.com/posts/challenge-52-ancestors-in-52-weeks/
2015 - Full list from Amy's site: start at https://www.nostorytoosmall.com/posts/announcing-52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-2015-edition/ and follow the links
2016 - (List not found)
2017 - (List not found)
2018 - Not from Amy's own site: https://walkingthegenes.com/odds-and-ends/52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-2018-challenge
2019 - Amy's: https://www.amyjohnsoncrow.com/52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-2019-themes-testing/
2020 - Amy's: https://www.amyjohnsoncrow.com/52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-2020-themes/ 
2021 - Not from Amy's own site: https://www.familytreeforum.com/forum/research-advice/the-writers-shed/72278-52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-contents-for-2020-2021-2022#post1158899 (shows 2020-2022)
2022 - Not from Amy's own site: https://www.familytreeforum.com/forum/research-advice/the-writers-shed/72278-52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-contents-for-2020-2021-2022#post1158899 (shows 2020-2022)
2023 - Not from Amy's own site: https://petrinipage.com/2023/01/21/52-ancestors-52-weeks-52-themes/
2024 - Not from Amy's own site: https://petrinipage.com/2023/12/29/52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-of-2024/
2025 - Amy's: https://www.amyjohnsoncrow.com/52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-themes-2025/
2026 - Amy's: https://www.amyjohnsoncrow.com/52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-themes-for-2026/









Sunday, November 30, 2025

A PARRY family in Potton, Bedfordshire

The cemetery in Potton, Bedfordshire, contains a gravestone to the memory of three members of a PARRY family. 



Bedfordshire is not an area where the PARRY surname occurs frequently, so the grave prompted questions about who the family were, where they had come from, and why had they moved to Potton.  

This post is the result of the subsequent research.  It is a long post, and I imagine there is still more that could be discovered, but I trust the headings will make the story easier to navigate.

A potential beginning 

Their story begins up in Northup, in Flintshire, North Wales, with the birth of an Elias PARRY, in about 1806.1

It is possible that he was the Elias who was born in Northop on the 12th October 1805, and baptised in the Calvinistic Methodist Church in Northop, on the 15th April 1806.2

If he was, then future researchers are very fortunate, since the church records contain a level of detail not generally found in baptism records.  As well as both the birth and baptism dates, they indicate that the baptism had taken place in a house, rather than in a chapel, and that the ceremony was performed by a Reverend Mr Williams. 

This Elias was the son of a John PARRY, a schoolmaster, and his wife, Catherine, formerly BELLIS. Their residence was in Caerfallwch, a township in the parish of Northop.3

In addition to the residence, the record also includes a parish for each of the parents - in John's case, this was Holyhead and, in Catherine's, prior to her marriage, it had been Northop. These parishes were possibly included because of the Poor Laws - under those laws, if someone fell on hard times and needed parish assistance, it wasn't necessarily the parish where they lived that would provide the support, it was the parish where they had a 'right of settlement'. The settlement parish was usually the parish of birth although, in the case of a married woman, her's then became the same parish as her husband's. 

But, whatever the reason for this information being included, if the baptism is the correct one,4 then such details could help in tracing the earlier generations.

Occupation and family

In 1831, Elias PARRY became a student at Cheshunt College, in Hertfordshire.5 Cheshunt was a training college for nonconformist ministers. It had originally been set up in Trevecca, Breconshire, in 1768, by the Countess of Huntingdon but, after the death of the Countess in 1791, the college relocated to Cheshunt.6

When his term of study had finished, Elias moved to Cheltenham in Gloucestershire, where he became a minister in the Portland Chapel House.  This was one of the nonconformist chapels belonging to the Countess of Huntingdon's Connexion.   

But relationships had clearly been formed while he was at the college and, on the 14th May 1833, Elias PARRY married Sarah JEEVES back in Cheshunt.  Elias was described as a bachelor, and of Cheltenham.  Sarah, who was a minor, was described as of Cheshunt.  Her father was deceased and the marriage was noted as taking place with the consent of "Elizabeth JEEVES - widow - the natural & lawful mother of the said minor."  

A licence for the marriage had been issued by the Faculty Office the previous day, the 13th May 1833, and it is possible that the licence might give additional information about Elias and Sarah.7

As well as those official records, the marriage was reported in at least two newspapers.8

In these, Elias was described as the eldest son of Mr PARRY, a bookseller of Chester - which means, either, the above baptism is not the correct one, or his (potential) father, John PARRY, the schoolmaster, had moved from Caerfallwch to Chester, and changed his occupation, in the intervening years.

After their marriage, Elias and Sarah lived in Cheltenham, where their first child, Catherine, was born on 22nd March 1834.  She was baptised on the 4th June 1834, the ceremony being performed by a John PARRY. There were two other children baptised that day by the John PARRY and, while Catherine's baptism was witnessed by a James DOWNING, her father, Elias, witnessed the baptisms of the other two children.9

It is not known whether there was any connection between the John and Elias, other than them both serving as ministers, and both having the same surname.

"Success" leads to a move

Later, it was reported that Elias had "so distinguished himself" at Cheltenham, that he was invited by a large number of members of a chapel in Spa-fields to become their minister.10 This he did and, from January 1835, records show him as the minister at the Providence Chapel, Chadwell Street, in the parish of Saint James, Clerkenwell.11

The congregation increased and, as a result, a new chapel building was proposed. In order to achieve this, an area of ground was rented, and loans were taken out to construct the building, after which a trust deed was executed, specifying the conditions for the management of the chapel, and the relationships between the Trustees and the minister.  An account of the laying of the foundation stone of the "New Tabernacle for the Seceders of Spafields Chapel, under the pastoral care of the Rev. Elias Parry" was advertised as being in the edition of "The Evangelical Register" published on the 1st May 1835.12

The "Northampton Tabernacle", in Upper Rosoman Street, Clerkenwell opened later in 1835 and one of the first baptisms was that of Thomas PARRY, the son of Elias and Sarah.  This time, the ceremony was performed by Elias. Thomas had been born on 27th October 1835, and the family were living at No.6 River Street, Myddleton Square, Middlesex.13

More children followed - first, Sarah, born on the 28th August 1837, and baptised on the 17th December, and then, Selina, born on the 20th September 1840, and baptised on the 6th January 1841.  The family were still living in River Street for Sarah's birth but, by the time Selina was born, they had moved to No.11 Vincent Terrace, River Terrace, City Road. 

And it is in Vincent Terrace that they can be found in the 1841 census,14 with the family consisting of Elias, aged 35, whose occupation was recorded as a "dissenting minister", Sarah, aged 25, Catherine, aged 7, Thomas, aged 5, Sarah, aged 3, and Selina, aged 7 months.  With them are Elizabeth JEEVES, aged 60, and Thomas JEEVES aged 25, potentially Sarah's mother and a possible brother.  There were also two servants.

The birth of Elias and Sarah's fifth child, Mary Elizabeth, was registered during the second quarter of 1842, and she was baptised on the 12th March 1843 - the entry is out of sequence, coming between entries for the 9th July 1843 and 26th November 1843, so perhaps it had initially been missed out, when the other baptisms on that day were written up.  Her birth date isn't recorded but the address for the family was now 2 Holford Square, Pentonville.

Not all of the baptisms in the register have the final column, "By whom the ceremony was performed," completed but, for those that do, Elias's is the only name that occurs. So it seems that he was the sole minister at the chapel, which, later, would be described as having been built "especially for the purpose of securing the services" of Elias.15

There are quite a few references to Elias in the newspapers, because of his activities as the minister of Northampton Chapel. He is involved in the publication of tracts, and is listed as a speaker at various meetings. An article about the history of the chapel is also published, along with a portrait of Elias.16

Unfortunately, such success did not continue, and court cases reported in the newspapers in 1848 reveal a change in Elias's fortunes. 

It appears that, in 1842, there were some disagreements in the church and an accusation was made, by two individuals, against Elias, an accusation that he "had been guilty of indecent conduct with some girl." Several articles indicate the rumours were started by one of the trustees, who "entertained some bad feeling against" Elias, although the reason for such feeling was never discovered. An enquiry was held, but there was no proof brought against Elias and he was "honourably acquitted", with two thirds of the congregation expressing their opinion that the charges were "totally unfounded."

However, perhaps annoyed at continued rumours, Elias resigned in September 1842.  A meeting of the congregation was promptly held but, since this did not meet the requirement for three months notice of any such meeting, any decisions were set aside and another meeting was arranged for January 1843.  At this second meeting, the majority of the congregation expressed their gratitude for the manner in which Elias had "discharged the duties of his sacred office, and their entire confidence in him." Following this, Elias agreed to continue as their minister.17

But the damage was done. 

In such independent, nonconformist chapels, the money to pay, not just the minister's salary, but also all the running costs, and loan repayments etc, predominantly comes through the members' activities and contributions.  But, because of the rumours, the congregation numbers decreased from around 700 to 200.  The consequent reduction in income made the financial situation impossible, and the trustees found themselves unable to meet the interest payments on the building loan.  A decree was made by the Chancery Court, on the 18th July 1845, that accounts for the chapel should be drawn up and, if the Chancery Master found that the income was insufficient to cover the expenditure, then the chapel was to be sold.18

In February 1846, the trustees, and Elias, both had a man in the chapel, to be 'in possession' of it. But on the 11th February, the trustees forcibly ejected the man Elias had given authority to, boarded up the windows, stripped Elias’s pew of its furniture, and locked the doors. 

Thus the chapel was closed.

An initial attempt at selling the chapel failed, but an offer was later made, which the Court of Chancery sanctioned in March 1847.

In 1848, newspapers carried reports of a case before the Court of Queen's Bench, which was the result of the incident in February 1846.  This was for an 'action of trespass', which Elias PARRY brought against the trustees, for improperly turning him out of possession, and for having seized and sold property belonging to him, which was in the chapel at the time of the alleged trespass.  The judge ruled that, based on the initial trust deed, Elias did not have the right of possession and therefore dismissed the 'trespass'. He left the question of the items that were seized, and sold, by the trustees for the jury to decide, and they found in favour of Elias. 

However, there were continued legal arguments over whether, even if the items had belonged to Elias, an action of 'trespass' was the correct one to have been brought.19 Following a ruling on that, it was then discovered that the defendants had actually sold the items after the initial action had been brought against them, which meant the judge declared that there needed to be a new trial, unless Elias consented to what was called a "stet processus" - in other words, a halt to the proceedings.20

At the same time, there was a case going through the Vice Chancellors' Court, concerning the salary due to Elias, in which the mortgagees were looking to have a declaration by the court regarding whether their claim, as mortgagees, took priority over the minister's claim for his salary, when it came to distributing the sale proceeds.  The case was likely to have implications for any dissenting minister. Elias's counsel put forward the opinion that his claim was "equal to that of a seaman, who, although the purpose of a voyage may fail, is entitled to his wages" and that, without the service of Elias, the property would have been unproductive.21

Unfortunately, for Elias, the judge ruled that "there could be no doubt about the mortgagees' priority" and directed that the mortgage, and the legal costs, should be paid first and then, only if there was any residue, would Elias be paid the money due to him (which included, not just £161 14s 10d for his salary down to the time of his resignation, in September 1842, but also £639 as remuneration for his services as 'temporary minister' from September 1842 until February 1846.)22

From the figures quote in the article, it seems unlikely Elias would have received the total amount due to him and, depending on the legal costs, might have received very little.

The absence of later newspaper reports for either case, after November 1848, would suggest that neither Elias, nor the Trustees, continued to argue them.

And Elias certainly had other concerns - for, on the 13th February 1849, his wife, Sarah, died. She was not yet 35 years old.  

Her death was registered by a neighbour, Ellen DRAYTON, from 1 Holford Square, who had been present when Sarah died. The PARRY family were still living at 2 Holford Square, Clerkenwell.  Sarah, described as the "wife of Elias Parry Dissenting Minister," died from convulsions (17 hours) and coma (6 hours). No further cause of death was given and, despite having her exact death date, her burial has not yet been identified.23

Sarah's death was also reported in some newspapers.24

Another move

Perhaps it is not surprising, after all these events, that Elias would seek a new start and, soon after Sarah's death, he moved to Kent where, in August 1849, after five months of being with the congregation at the Zion Chapel in Dover, he was invited to be their minister.25 The Zion Chapel was on the corner of Last Lane and Queen Street and, at the time, seems to have been a Congregational Church.26

His role at the chapel was confirmed through the 1851 census, where his occupation is recorded as "Independent Minister of Zion Chapel." The family were living at Camden Cottage, Folkestone Road, Hougham, in Kent.  Elias was the head, a widower aged 45, born in Northop, Flintshire.  With him were his four daughters, Catharine, aged 17, Sarah, aged 13, Selina, aged 10, and Mary E., aged 9.  All of the children were shown as born in London, Middlesex, although that was obviously incorrect for Catherine, who had been born in Cheltenham.27

It is likely that Thomas, the son, was the 15 year old scholar, born London, Middlesex, who is in the household of Theophilus HEWLETT, in Eythorne, Kent.28

Although there is no address given, this is clearly a school - the occupation for Theophilus is "Head master & classical tutor," and his wife is recorded as a "Preceptress." As well as their own children, and domestic staff, the household contains two other teachers, one, a teacher of French, the other, of mathematics & drawing, as well as twenty five, 'non-family,' scholars, whose ages range from seven to fifteen.  

A newspaper advert, in 1842, for the "Eythorne Classical and Commercial School, conducted by Mr Theophilus Hewlett," indicates that the school is situated in a "beautiful and healthy part of Kent, six miles north-west of Dover; and being near the London Road, is of easy access." The advert refers to ministers being able to supply references regarding the school, and a later advert, in 1855, indicates that "This school is highly recommended by parents who have long tested its efficiency, and who consider Evangelical religion of the highest importance in the training of youth" so, given his father's occupation, it is possible that Thomas had been a pupil at the school before Elias moved his family to Dover.29

The Zion chapel records do not seem to be available on any of the genealogical company sites, so the main evidence for Elias's activities, while in Dover, comes from newspaper reports - which indicate what were, probably, the fairly typical activities of an evangelical minister at the time: He joined other ministers from the Baptist, Independent, and Wesleyan churches at the first public meeting of a branch of the "British Society for the Propagation of the Gospel among the Jews", in October 1849.30 He was described as "the respected minister of Zion Chapel" when he put forward a resolution at the Wesleyan Missions annual meeting.31 He spoke at a Sunday School Union, "Teachers' Conference."32 He was on the platform for a meeting of the "Dover Ladies Bible Association" in September 1850.33 In October 1850, he officiated at a marriage in the Zion Chapel, Dover.34 He was one of the ministers present at a large meeting of the Dover gentry, councillors, and tradesmen, who were considering an address to Queen Victoria to express their support for her and indignation at papal "insolent aggression on Protestantism, and pretension to supremacy in England."35 He presided at the second Sunday School Festival, in July 1851.36 He was present, and seconded a motion, at the "thirty-ninth anniversary of the Cinque Ports Bible Association" in May 1852.37

At the third Sunday School Union festival in July 1852, not only did Elias speak at the morning meeting, but, in the afternoon, when the students and teachers gathered, they proceeded to the Zion Chapel where he addressed them "most suitably" and the students were described as having paid "deep attention" to the "well-timed remarks of the rev. gentleman."38

Elias also addressed the public meeting in the morning of the fourth Sunday School Union Festival in July 1853.39

However, according to a history of the Congregational churches in Kent, which was published in 1911, Elias resigned from the Zion chapel in Dover, in August 1853, soon after that festival. The article states that he subsequently moved to Hereford, where he became the minister of the Countess of Huntingdon's Chapel there.40

But, in between the time in Dover, and then Hereford, Elias moved back to London, where he was recorded in the electoral rolls, between 1855-1860, as living at 2 Sussex Terrace, Lambeth, and then, in 1860-62, as living at 4 Kennington Street, Lambeth, both addresses within the parish of St Mary, Newington.41

At the time of the 1861 census, Elias, with his two oldest children, Thomas and Catherine, are living at 4 Beresford Street, in St Mary Newington. Elias, aged 55, was recorded as an "Independent Minister & tutor", Thomas, aged 25, was a "private tutor" and Catherine, aged 27 (this time with her correct birthplace) was a "Governess (out of situation)".42

Sarah is difficult to identify in the 1861 census, but the other two daughters are more obvious:
    - Selina is in Reading, Berkshire, visiting a William THOMAS and his family, at 31 Castle Street. She is an unmarried, 20 year old, "teacher of music". William THOMAS is a travelling insurance agent.42
    - Mary Elizabeth, aged 19, is visiting her uncle, Thomas JEEVES, in Henley-on-Thames.  Thomas JEEVES is recorded as being a member of the Stock Exchange.42

Elias's final move

It is not so easy to conclusively identify references to Elias following his move to Hereford, since the surname occurs quite frequently in that area. However, in February 1863, he, along with other ministers, addressed a meeting advocating the cause of the Baptist Missionary Society.43

So he had moved to Hereford sometime between April 1861 and February 1863.

In 1863, he also had problems with a broken water pipe in his house in Hereford - which meant he was charged by the Corporation for "allowing the city water to run to waste in his house." The case was adjourned for a week, during which time the pipe was to be repaired "to the satisfaction of the surveyor". There does not seem to be another reference to the case, so one assumes the pipe was fixed satisfactorily!44

Elias died of "paralysis" on the 8th May 1864, at 38 Bridge Street, St Nicholas, Hereford, aged 58.  His occupation was recorded as "Minister of the Gospel Lady Huntingdon" and the informant was a Mary GRIFFITHS, who had been present at his death. He was buried in St Martin's churchyard, Hereford.45

The later life of Elias and Sarah PARRY's children

In 1871, Elias's eldest daughter, Catherine, is possibly boarding in Marylebone, an unmarried milliner, aged 36, born Cheltenham, Gloucester.46 However, it hasn't been possible to identify her in any records after that.

Nor has it been possible to find any further information regarding Sarah, following the 1851 census.

After appearing with her uncle in 1861, Mary Elizabeth can be found boarding with a Phoebe KEMPSTER, in Burford, Oxfordshire, in both the 1871 and the 1881 censuses, aged 29 and then 39 respectively, unmarried and with no occupation listed in either. In the 1891 census, she is possibly the 49 year old, unmarried, Mary E PARRY, boarding with a George STEGER and family, in Midford, South Stoke, Somerset. Mary was described as "of Independent Means." But it hasn't been possible to identify her in any records after 1891.47

Selina is the only daughter known to have married - she married a Thomas GORROD, in St. James', the parish church of Great Grimsby, Lincolnshire, on the 11th June 1870. The residence for both Selina and Thomas, at the time of their marriage, was King Edward Street.  Thomas was a fisherman and his father, another Thomas GORROD, was a brass founder.  Selina's father was listed as Elias PARRY, minister.  It was not recorded that Elias was deceased. The witnesses were a James GORROD and a James PARKER.48

Selina can be found in all the censuses from 1871-191149, before she dies in Sculcoates, Yorkshire, in the first quarter of 1913. She does appear in several family trees on Ancestry, and there are living descendants.

And, finally, Thomas... heading towards the Potton connection (at last!)

As indicated above, at the time of the 1861 census, Thomas's occupation was as a private tutor.

He married Louisa Elizabeth WILLIAMS, in the Trinity Church, in the parish of St Mary, Newington, Surrey, on the 24th October 1868.  His occupation was recorded as a schoolmaster, but no evidence has been found, so far, for which school he might have been working at (although later information, from Thomas's obituary, has now provided some hints as to where to look). The occupation of his father, Elias, was recorded as a minister and, as with Selina's marriage record, there is no reference to Elias being deceased.50

Louisa had no occupation recorded, and her father, Edward Henry WILLIAMS, was a wine merchant. Thomas and Louisa were both living in Dover Road, at the time of their marriage. It is believed that Louisa had been born on 22nd February 1838, and baptised on the 17th February 1840, at St Paul, Deptford, the daughter of Edward Henry and Elizabeth WILLIAMS.51

The birth of Thomas and Louisa's first child, Ethelwyn Louisa PARRY, was registered in the March quarter of 1871, in Hackney district. This meant she was born in time to be included in the 1871 census, where she appears with her parents, Thomas, aged 34, a school teacher, and Louisa, aged 31, living at Portland Villa, in Hackney, Middlesex. Boarding with them was a married nurse, [Sannah?] MILWARD.52

However, Ethelwyn was not baptised until 1873. A second child, Sarah Elizabeth, was born on 20 April 187253, and the baptisms of both Ethelwyn and Sarah took place in the parish church of Hackney on the 14th December 1873.  At this time, the family were living in Grove Street, Hackney, Middlesex. 

Thomas and Louisa's third child, Thomas Jeeves PARRY, was born on the 9th October 1874, his middle name, no doubt, in memory of his grandmother. No record of a baptism has been found, so far.

In 1881, all five of the family are present at their home in 64 Lauriston Road, Hackney - Thomas, aged 47, Louisa E, aged 40, Ethelwin L, aged 10, Sarah E, aged 8, and Thomas J, aged 5, along with a 14 year old, Mary A BUCKMASTER, who was a general domestic servant.  Thomas was still working as a school master.54

It seems the family moved to Bromley, in Kent, some time between 1881-1886 and there they attended Bromley Congregational Church because, in July 1886, the name "Ethelwyn F PARRY," from that church, appears in a list of scholars being awarded certificates for their writing about "Daniel and his Companions."  Although the middle initial is incorrect, no other PARRYs have been found with the first name of Ethelwyn (or Ethelwin) for this date period.55

The move to Bromley is confirmed by the 1891 census, which shows Thomas, aged 55, Louisa E, aged 50 and Ethelwyn L, aged 20, living at 22 Widmore Road, Bromley. Thomas 's occupation is that of a "private schoolmaster." The two younger children are missing from the household - Sarah E PARRY was in Somerset, aged 18, and recorded as a "Governess music" at Townsend House, a school in Shepton Mallet, Somerset. Thomas J(eeves) PARRY, aged 17, was working as a Commercial Clerk in a shop, "The Stores House," in Bath Road, Chiswick. As well as Thomas 'junior', within the household were the stores manager, two cashiers, a butter/cheeseman's assistant, a fishmonger, a butcher, and a housekeeper - perhaps it was a forerunner of the modern supermarket!56

A similar pattern for the family is found in all the later censuses, Ethelwyn staying with her parents until their deaths, the two younger children out in paid employment.

By the time of the 1901 census, Thomas, Louisa and Ethelwyn are living in Haddenham, Cambridgeshire. Thomas, aged 63, is now a "retired schoolmaster." It has not been possible to identify Sarah, but Thomas Jeeves, still working as a commercial clerk, is now in Hornsey, Middlesex, boarding with a SHEEHAN family.57

The move to Potton

In 1903, while they were still living in Haddenham, Thomas's wife, Louisa, wrote her Will, but the family soon moved to Potton in Bedfordshire.  

It is possible they were living there by September 1905, when one of the stalls at the "Japanese Bazaar and Feast of Lanterns," held in the Central Hall, was described as "Osaka - Sweet, Fruit, and Ice Cream Stall," and arranged by "Miss PARRY, Mrs PERRY, Miss MARSDEN."58

Was the "Mrs PERRY" a mistake and that should also have been PARRY, it being Ethelwyn and her mother? We'll possibly never know.

The newspaper report mentions that the "Central Hall" was called that because of the varied nature of the activities it was used for - "secular (parochial and political,) as well as sacred" - but that it had been built a year or two before, primarily for the Congregational Church Sunday School, and that the purpose of the bazaar, which took place over three days, was to reduce the debt on the building.  The PARRYs running a stall at the bazaar would indicate their involvement with nonconformist churches had not ended with the death of Elias.

Louisa Elizabeth PARRY died in Potton on the 24th February 1907, aged 69. The family were living at "Ivydene", a house in Blackbird Street, Potton.  Her death was reported in several newspapers, as was the fact that the funeral was taken by the Rev. J F BRADEY, the Congregational Minister.59 One newspaper reported that Louisa had "recently" come to live in Potton - but how long does one need to live in a small town like Potton, where some families have lived for hundreds of years, before you are no longer regarded as a 'recent' incomer?60

Louisa's Will was proved on the 23rd March 1907. Although her husband, Thomas, was still alive, she had made her son, Thomas Jeeves PARRY, the executor.  He was probably still living, and working, in North London since, just over a year later, on the 15th August 1908, he married Elizabeth Jane PRESS, in Christ Church, Hornsey.  At the time he was living in 7 Birchington Rd, Crouch End, and his father Thomas, was described as a "Retired Schoolmaster." His sister, Sarah Elizabeth PARRY, was one of the witnesses.61

 In 1909, at the Potton Flower Show, ("the third annual show under the auspices of the Potton Horticultural Society") Miss PARRY, probably Ethelwyn again, came second in the "Foliage plant" category.62

The 1910 Lloyd George Domesday survey, one of the prompts for this research, took place between 1910-1915.  It was a nationwide valuation of land and property, introduced as a result of the 1909-1910 Finance Act. This Act implemented a tax based on the increase in the value of a property as a result of public spending on communal infrastructure. Details for each property are very comprehensive.63

Thomas PARRY is recorded as living at Ivydene, which was no.14 Blackbird Street.  The owner of the house was Harry KITCHENER, a prominent landowner in the town.  The house contained 3 bedrooms, 2 sitting rooms, a kitchen, a scullery and a wc (possible inside, since it isn't specified as outside, which the washhouse for no.16, next door, was.)

Thomas and his daughter, (recorded as "E.L") are still in Blackbird Street in the 1911 census, when their ages were initially just entered as "over 70" and "full" respectively, but had then been modified to "about 70" and "about 40." Had they declined to be more precise?  They would certainly have been literate and numerate enough to know their own ages! Their occupations were noted as "Retired Schoolmaster," and "Housekeeper Domestic."64

There are very few references to Thomas PARRY in Potton, but there are several to "Miss PARRY" - undoubtably Ethelwyn, since they are the only PARRY family in Potton at the time.  She clearly took an active part in the Congregational Church, as well as with other Christian organisations.  

At some time, she became the treasurer of the local branch of the "British Women's Temperance Association,"(B.W.T.A.) but was not present for the AGM in February 1912, so the balance sheet was read by Miss Emily RICHARDSON instead. At a meeting of the B.W.T.A. in early 1913, Miss PARRY was one of a number of ladies speaking - in her case, she read a paper on "Temperance as an aid to religion."65

Later that year, she was again helping on a stall at a 'sale of work' in the Central Hall, raising funds for the Congregational Church.66

In June 1914, following the reading of an 'interesting paper' on "African Missions" at the Christian Endeavour meeting in the Central Hall, both Miss PARRY, and a Miss BOOTH, were noted as joining in the discussion afterwards (no names were quoted for any men who spoke, apart from the Reverend who initially read the paper.)67

At the Congregational Mothers' Meeting, in February 1916, she made the presentation to two ladies, Mrs BRAYBROOKS and Mrs W BOND SMITH, to thank them for their 'untiring work.'68

On the 17th February, 1919, came a day which Ethelwyn was perhaps dreading, yet knew was unavoidable - the death of her father, Thomas, aged 82 years. As well as a standard notice under the "Deaths," there was an Obituary within the Potton section of the local newspaper, which sheds more light on Thomas PARRYs life69:

 We deeply regret to have to record the death of Mr. Parry, who passed away on Monday at his residence, at the advanced age of 82 years. Mr. Parry retired from the scholastic profession on coming to reside in Potton about 14 years ago, previous to which he was principal of schools at South Hackney and Bromley. He received his education abroad and was a man of great abilities. The funeral took place at the Cemetery on Thursday, the 20th inst., where the remains were laid to rest in the same grave as his wife who predeceased him just 12 years. The deceased leaves one son and two daughters, for whom much sympathy is felt.

Of course, newspapers do not always get the facts right - so far, there has been no evidence for Thomas being educated abroad, and he was already described as being a 'retired' schoolmaster in the 1901 census, when he was living in Haddenham. 

But he was certainly in South Hackney and in Bromley so, if he was the principal of schools in those places, there will possibly be more records relating to him there.

No Will appears to have been proved for Thomas's estate, which seems a bit surprising, since one might have expected him to have made a Will at the same time as his wife did, arranging their affairs in preparation for the 'inevitable'.  

Ethelwyn continued to live in "Ivydene" and, during June and July 1919, placed several adverts in newspapers, under the "Seaside and Country" section:

"FURN'D APARTMENTS, with attendance; home comforts, good cooking, moderate terms. - Miss Parry, Ivydene, Potton"70

It was the only 'country' location among adverts for various seaside places, such as Great Yarmouth, Bournemouth, Brighton Hove, and Lowestoft.

In 1921, Ethelwyn, aged 49 years, 5 months, was still living in Blackbird Street, and was being visited by an Emily Winifred HICKMAN, aged 42 years, 11 months, another unmarried lady, who was born in Hampshire.71

Ethelwyn continued to appear in newspaper articles relating to her church activities - she was one of twelve ladies involved in a 'hat making competition' during a Wesley Guild "gentleman's surprise night" (she came 4th.)72 She also took part in the annual collection for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children in December 1928.73

One might have expected Ethelwyn to live out her days in Potton, involved with such Christian, and charitable, activities.  

But no!

For, on the 9th April 1932, Ethelwyn Louisa PARRY, a spinster aged 61, resident of Potton, Beds, married Edward Rowland HARPER, a widowed, 54 year old, mechanic, in Great Yarmouth. The wedding was reported in the local newspapers:

MARRIAGE OF MISS E. L. PARRY 

An interesting wedding took place on Saturday last, 9th inst., at St. Nicholas Church, Gt Yarmouth, between Miss Ethelwyn Louisa Parry (late of "Ivydene", Potton), elder daughter of the late Mr. Parry (an old and highly respected inhabitant of Potton), and Mr. Edward Roland Harper, of Gt Yarmouth, the ceremony being performed by the Rev. Mr. Ellwood. The bride, accompanied by her brother, who subsequently gave her away, wore a gown of blue crépe-de-chine, with coat and hat to tone, and carried a bouquet of pink carnations. She was attended by one bridesmaid, Miss Castina Harper (daughter of the bridegroom), who was attired in emerald green lace. with a short musquash coat and black straw hat. Mr. P. T. Barrett, brother-in-law of the bridegroom, was best man. Many useful presents were received by the newly married pair, and the bride carries with her to her new home at Gt Yarmouth the good wishes of her numerous friends in Potton.74

The witnesses were her brother, Thomas J PARRY and Castina A L HARPER.  On the parish register, her father, Thomas PARRY was shown as a 'schoolmaster' - again, as with the earlier marriages of her father, and her aunt, Selina, there was no reference to her father being deceased.75

Sadly, the HARPERs did not enjoy many years of married life, since Ethelwyn died on the 15th August 1939 in Gt Yarmouth, as a result of malignant terratomas.76

The Final connection to Potton.

One might imagine that, with Ethelwyn's move to Gt Yarmouth, any link to Potton would have come to an end - but so far, only Louisa, in 1907, and Thomas, in 1919, have been buried in the grave in Potton cemetery.

The third burial is that of their daughter, Sarah Elizabeth PARRY.

From the 1891 census, it was known that Sarah had begun working as a music teacher.  Although she has not been identified in the 1901 census, in the 1911 census, she is working as an "assistant mistress" at the Wilton House School, Parkside Road, Reading. Ten years later, in 1921, she is the matron at the "College School, West Promenade, in Colwyn Bay, North Wales. By the time of the 1939 Register, Sarah, now a “retired music mistress”, is living in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, at 78 Northgate Street.77

Sarah Elizabeth PARRY died on the 12th March 1942, at the Mental Hospital, in Upton, Northamptonshire, aged 69 years.78

But the "Rank and Profession" column of her death certificate states:

of 23 Market Square, 
Potton Bedfordshire
a spinster.
a Teacher of Music
Daughter of
Thomas Parry
Schoolmaster
(Deceased)
 

So, at some stage between the 1939 Register and her death in 1942, Sarah seems to have moved from Great Yarmouth to Potton, before going into the hospital in Upton - but when, and why, considering she did not appear in any records for Potton while her parents and sister were living there, remains a mystery.  

Perhaps she had moved to Great Yarmouth, after her retirement, to be near to Ethelwyn? Or, depending on when she retired, perhaps she had even moved in with Ethelwyn in Potton, prior to Ethelwyn's marriage, and then followed her to Great Yarmouth, before returning to Potton after Ethelwyn's death? 

Sarah did not leave a Will, and probate of her estate was granted to her brother, Thomas Jeeves PARRY,  on the 13th April 1942. Thomas was described as a retired company official, "the lawful brother of the whole blood and only person entitled to the estate." At the time he was living at 63 The Ridgeway, Kenton, Harrow, Middlesex.

And so, with the third burial, this PARRY family's connection with Potton came to an end.


A final note - Both Elias's daughter, Selina PARRY, who married Thomas GORROD, and Thomas's son, Thomas Jeeves PARRY, are known to have had descendants, some of which are likely to still be living. These branches have therefore not been traced for this research.

However, if they, or anyone else who might descend from, or have information about, the family above, can add to the details about the family, please get in touch, either through the comments below, or by emailing me via the PARRY One-Name Study at https://one-name.org/name_profile/parry/

Thank you


Notes & Sources 
(NB any event, such as a baptism, or marriage, which does not have a source entered, should be easy to find on either Ancestry, or on FindMyPast - but not necessarily on both - from the information given above.)

1. Elias's birth place of Northop: 

1851 census: HO107; Piece: 1632; Folio: 702; Page: 6;  
1861 census: Rg 9; Piece: 339; Folio: 122; Page: 29; 

2. Potential baptism of Elias PARRY: FindMyPast "England & Wales Non-Conformist Births and Baptisms", and on Ancestry, "England & Wales, Non-Conformist and Non-Parochial Registers, 1567-1936", TNA/RG/4/4495.

 3. Caerfallwch being a township in the parish of Northop: https://www.genuki.org.uk/big/wal/FLN/Caerfallwch

4. Reasons why the quoted baptism might not be the correct one: 

    1. There is a burial of a twenty-one year old Elias PARRY in Llandwrog, Caernarvonshire, on the 4 July 1827, which would make him born about 1806.  I haven't found another baptism of an Elias around 1806 so, although Llandwrog is over sixty miles away from Northop, it does mean there were (at least) two Elias PARRYs born around the same time.
    2. The change in occupation, and location, for the father, John PARRY, between the baptism in 1806 and Elias's marriage in 1833.

5. Elias PARRY admitted as a student to Cheshunt: article about the History of the Congregational churches in Kent. Kentish Express 14 October 1911

6. Trevecca and Cheshunt Theological Colleges: 
https://www.genuki.org.uk/big/wal/ChurchHistory/TheoColl

7. The marriage details, and existence of the licence, are from FindMyPast: Marriage: Hertfordshire Banns & Marriages, Licence: Faculty Office Marriage Licences (no image)

8. Newspaper notices for marriage of Elias and Sarah at Cheshunt: Chester Chronicle 7 June 1833, Stockport Advertiser and Guardian 7 June 1833.

9. Portland Chapel House Register: (Ancestry) Registers of Births, Marriages and Deaths surrendered to the Non-parochial Registers Commissions of 1837 and 1857; Class Number: Rg 4; Piece Number: 3951

10. Elias "so distinguished himself" at Cheltenham: Morning Post 8 February 1848 [Note this paper does have a date error in the article, stating it was 1844, rather than 1834, when Elias moved to London] 

11. Elias PARRY as minister at Providence Chapel: Rg4; Piece 4492: Clerkenwell, Rosoman St., Northampton, Chadwell St. (Calvinistic Methodist), 1835-1837

12. Advert for publication mentioning the laying of the foundation stone for the new chapel:  Patriot 29 April 1835

13. Birth and baptism of Thomas PARRY - baptism date differences noted: 
Rg4; Piece 4492 has baptism March 9th (but mistranscribed on Ancestry as May 9th). 
Rg 8; Piece 39 has baptism as 27th March. 
The RG8 record is potentially the incorrect one, since it appears the baptisms from Rg4; Piece 4492 might have been copied into the register filed under RG8, before later baptisms were then added. So the earlier source is more likely to be correct, especially since Thomas's birth was on a 27th.
The other children's' baptisms are all in the RG8 register.

14. 1841 census: HO107; Piece: 664; Book: 3; Civil Parish: St Mary Islington East; County: Middlesex; Enumeration District: 6; Folio: 6; Page: 7; 

15. Northampton Chapel, Upper Rosoman Street, built "especially for the purpose of securing the services" of Elias: Express (London) 8 February 1848. Weekly Chronicle (London) 12 February 1848 (and several other newspapers)

16. Examples of references to Elias as minister:
Publication of tracts: Patriot 26 June 1837
A speaker at various meetings, or preaching on a specific topic: eg 
    - At the Farewell service of Rev. W Duggan Patriot 29 January 1844, 
    - As a signatory on an appeal to the Churches in the State of South Carolina regarding the death sentence passed on someone who harboured an escaped slave and deploring "the prevalence of a system which can with impunity make "merchandise of slaves and the souls of men,' and put the same valuation on men and women as upon cattle" Patriot 1 & 3 April 1844
    - London Peace Society listing of ministers intending to preach "sermons on the pacific principles of Christianity as condemnatory of war" Patriot 8 May 1845, 
    - Advert for a history of the chapel, including a portrait of Elias, in the Evangelical Register May No.VIII: Patriot 27 & 30 March 1837, Weekly Chronicle (London) 11 June 1837.

17. The accusations against Elias: Weekly Chronicle 12 Feb 1848. Morning Post 08 February 1848.

18. Chancery Court decree: Saint James's Chronicle 06 June 1848

19. Whether an action for 'trespass' was the correct one: Church & State Gazette (London) 28 April 1848

20. The references to "stet processus": Saint James's Chronicle 14 November 1848

21. The salary of a dissenting minister:  Saint James's Chronicle 6 June 1848, Patriot 22 June 1848

22. The mortgagees' priority: Saint James's Chronicle 06 June 1848, Douglas Jerrold's Weekly Newspaper 10 June 1848, Bell's Weekly Messenger 10 June 1848, British Banner 1848 14 June 1848, Patriot 22 June 1848

23. Death certificate for Sarah PARRY: GRO March qtr 1849, St James Clerkenwell, Vol.3 Page 75.

24. Newspaper notices of Sarah's death: Globe 15 February 1848, John Bull 17 February 1849.

25. Elias invited to be the minister at the Zion Chapel: Kentish Express 14 October 1911 

26. The Zion Chapel information: http://www.dover.freeuk.com/church/reform.htm (although there is an error in the list of ministers, which has Elias as "Ellis"), https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=494780.18https://doverhistorian.com/2017/03/09/theatres-part-i/ 

27. 1851 census:  HO107; Piece: 664; Book: 3; Civil Parish: St Mary Islington East; County: Middlesex; Enumeration District: 6; Folio: 6; Page: 7; 

28. Thomas PARRY in 1851:  HO107; Piece: 1631; Folio: 493; Page: 23;

29. The school of Theophilus HEWLETT in Eythorne: Patriot 18 July 1842, Patriot 9 July 1855.

30. "British Society for the Propagation of the Gospel among the Jews": Dover Chronicle 13 October 1849.  

31. Wesleyan Missions annual meeting: Dover Chronicle 1 June 1850.  

32. Sunday School Union, "Teachers' Conference.": Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser 06 July 1850   

33. "Dover Ladies Bible Association": Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser 21 September 1850 

34. Officiated at a marriage in the Zion Chapel: Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser 2 November 1850 

35. The meeting regarding the address to Queen Victoria: Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser 23 November 1850, Kentish Gazette 26 November 1850   

36. Second Sunday School Festival: Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser 26 July 1851  

37. The "thirty-ninth anniversary of the Cinque Ports Bible Association":Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser 22 May 1852, Kentish Gazette 25 May 1852   

38. Third Sunday School Union Festival: Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser 24 July 1852  

39. Fourth Sunday School Union Festival: Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser 23 July 1853 

40. Newspaper report of Elias's resignation from the Zion Chapel and his move to Hereford:  Kentish Express 14 October 1911 

41. Lambeth Electoral Rolls: FindMyPast

42. 1861 census entries:
Elias, Thomas, and Catherine: Rg 9; Piece: 339; Folio: 122; Page: 29; [Elias as 'Elies' on FMP]
Selina: Rg 9; Piece: 745; Folio: 48; Page: 9;
Mary Elizabeth: Rg 9; Piece: 881; Folio: 85; Page: 20;

43. Baptist Missionary Society: Hereford Times 21 February 1863 

44. Broken water pipe: Hereford Journal 20 June 1863, Hereford Times 20 June 1863

45. Death of Elias PARRY: 
GRO (under PURRY) June qtr 1864, Hereford & Dore, Vol. 6A Page 325
Death notice: Chester Chronicle 21 May 1864
Burial: Kentish Express 14 October 1911.  

46. Potential 1871 census entry for Catherine PARRY:   RG10; Piece: 148; Folio: 59; Page: 49;

47. Potential census entries for Mary Elizabeth PARRY:
1871 census: RG10; Piece: 1454; Folio: 56; Page: 1; 
1881 census: RG11; Piece: 1517; Folio: 73; Page: 55; 
1891 census: RG12; Piece: 1930; Folio: 78; Page: 10; 

48. Selina PARRY's marriage: FindMyPast

49. Selina GORROD, formerly PARRY, census entries:
1871 census: RG10; Piece: 3415; Folio: 48; Page: 8; Clee called New Clee, Lincolnshire [surname as GARROD]
1881 census: RG11; Piece: 4911; Folio: 143; Page: 19; Stranton, County Durham, England.
1891 census: RG12; Piece: 3913; Folio: 17; Page: 28; Sutton with Stoneferry, Sculcoates, Yorkshire
1901 census: RG13; Piece: 4466; Folio: 74; Page: 39; Sculcoates, Yorkshire
1911 census: RG14PN28584 RG78PN1643 RD521 SD1 ED7 SN297 Sculcoates, Yorkshire [Selina's first name mistranscribed on Ancestry as "Schina" )

50. Marriage of Thomas PARRY: Ancestry London Church of England Parish Registers; Reference Number: P92/TRI/031

51. Birth details for Louisa Elizabeth WILLIAMS: Ancestry trees

52. 1871 census for Thomas PARRY & family:  RG10; Piece: 332; Folio: 35; Page: 66 

53. The birthdates for both Sarah Elizabeth PARRY and Thomas Jeeves PARRY come from the 1939 Register: SEP at RG101/6494H/005/16, TJP at RG101/0953J/013/13

54. 1881 census for Thomas PARRY & family: RG11; Piece: 313; Folio: 69; Page: 22; 

55. Essay competition: Bromley Record and Monthly Advertiser 01 July 1886

56. 1891 census entries:
Thomas, Louisa and Ethelwyn: RG12; Piece: 629; Folio: 70; Page: 7; 
Sarah E: RG12; Piece: 1910; Folio: 60; Page: 6;
Thomas J(eeves): RG12; Piece: 1034; Folio: 80; Page: 26;

57. 1901 census entries:
Thomas, Louisa and Ethelwyn: RG13; Piece: 1543; Folio: 49; Page: 11
Thomas J(eeves): RG13; Piece: 1239; Folio: 132; Page: 24

58. Japanese Bazaar and Feast of Lanterns: Biggleswade Chronicle 29 September 1905

59. Death of Louisa Elizabeth PARRY:  Bedfordshire Times & Independent 8 March 1907. Ampthill & District News 09 March 1907.

60. "Recently" came to Potton: Bedfordshire Mercury 15 March 1907

61. Marriage of Thomas Jeeves PARRY: on Ancestry

62. Plant Show:  Bedfordshire Mercury 6 August 1909, Bedfordshire Times and Independent 6 August 1909

63. About the 1910 Lloyd George Domesday survey: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/valuation-office-survey-land-value-ownership-1910-1915/, https://www.thegenealogist.co.uk/lloyd-george-domesday/

64. Thomas and Ethelwyn in 1911 census: RG14 PN:8898 RD:175 SD:1 ED:13 SN:16 [The 1911 summary books on Ancestry have the address as Back St, but it is clearly Blackbird St, from the schedule] 

65. BWTA: Biggleswade Chronicle 16 February 1912,  Bedfordshire Times and Independent 04 April 1913

66. Stall in Central Hall:  Bedfordshire Times and Independent 24 October 1913

67. Christian Endeavour Meeting:  Bedfordshire Times and Independent 26 June 1914

68. Congregational Mother's Meeting presentation: Bedfordshire Times and Independent 25 February 1916

69. Death of Thomas PARRY: Biggleswade Chronicle 21 February 1919

70. An example of Ethelwyn's adverts:  Bedford Record 10 June 1919

71. Ethelwyn in 1921 census:  RG 15/7951, ED 12, Sch 52; Book: 07951 [Both FindMyPast and Ancestry initially showed her name as Ethel William Louisa Parry. Corrections submitted] 

72. The hat making competition: Biggleswade Chronicle 23 February 1923

73. NSPCC collection:  Biggleswade Chronicle 7 December 1928

74. Ethelwyn's marriage:  Biggleswade Chronicle 15 April 1932. Also reduced version in Bedfordshire Times and Independent 15 April 1932

75. Marriage entry in parish register: on both Ancestry and FindMyPast

76. Death of Ethelwyn Louisa HARPER: GRO September Qtr 1939 Yarmouth Vol. 4B Page 17

77. Census & 1939 Register entries for Sarah Elizabeth PARRY:
1911 census: RG14PN6564 RG78PN326 RD121 SD1 ED9 SN85
1921 census: RG 15/27921, ED 5, Sch; Book: 27921
1939 Register: RG101/6494H/005/16

78. Death certificate for Sarah Elizabeth PARRY: GRO March qtr 1942 Brixworth Vol. 03B Page 241