Saturday, May 31, 2025

Activities in May - an unexpected PARRY sighting, and a visit to an ancestral village in Herefordshire.

The 'unexpected' PARRY sighting

A one-name study researches the genealogy, and family history, of all the people with that surname.  

Although that does not necessarily mean collecting every mention of the name (an impossibility for a frequently occurring surname, such as PARRY, in these days of the internet), I still love coming across references to the surname in unexpected places, and will always try to 'capture' those.

And so it was earlier this month, while I was enjoying a lovely day out at the RHS Malvern Spring Festival.1 

I'd decided to listen to a talk by Alan Titchmarsh and, since the main theatre area was full, was sitting out in the overflow, ready to watch the talk via a large screen.  On the screen, various adverts were cycling through beforehand. 

Suddenly, up popped an advert for PARRYS of Malvern, a jewellery company!

I was so surprised, the advert had been replaced by the time I got my camera out. So I then had to sit through all of Alan's talk, and several cycles of adverts, before I finally managed to obtain a photograph:


It felt like an "added bonus" to an already wonderful day.

Herefordshire

Following the show, I spent a few days in Herefordshire, so that I could attend some events that were being held as part of the Herefordshire Histories Festival2.  There were several that were of interest to me, but I focused on just a couple of them, in particular. One of these was the event in St Mary’s Church, Walterstone, entitled "From Walterstone to New York."3

This was an exhibition about a David Price, who emigrated to America in the 1840s. But the event was also aimed at attracting visitors "who are exploring the history of their own families or local properties or past life in Walterstone in general.

And that description certainly fits me!

Walterstone is part of an area known as Ewyas Lacy4, which is in the south west corner of Herefordshire, bordering Monmouthshire and Breconshire.  This border area is a "hot spot" for PARRY families - and Walterstone is one of the villages that some of my own ancestors lived in, as they moved around the area.

Next door to the church is a pub called the Carpenters Arms.  During the 1800s, and early 1900s, the owners of this pub were a PARRY family and, although I have not found any blood relationships between that PARRY family and my own, the two families definitely knew each other since, in 1911, my 2xgreat grandfather, Thomas PARRY, made John PARRY of the Carpenters Arms, one of the executors of his Will:


The keen-eyed among you will notice that my Thomas PARRY had a son who was also called John PARRY - but they were definitely two different Johns.

I shall write more, both about my Thomas PARRY, and about the Carpenter's Arms PARRYs, in my next post but, since it is already the last day of May, and I'm trying to stick to my aim of at least one post per month, that's all for now.


Notes and References

1. The RHS Malvern Spring Festival: https://www.rhs.org.uk/shows-events/malvern-spring-festival

2.The Herefordshire Histories Festival: https://herefordshirehistories.org/

3. Exhibition "From Walterstone to New York.": https://herefordshirehistories.org/walterstone-to-new_york/

4. Ewyas Lacy: https://www.ewyaslacy.org.uk/doc.php?d=rs_home_sub1




Wednesday, April 30, 2025

April - the 2025 Guild Conference - "Gateway to the World"

 Last weekend saw the annual conference of the Guild of One-name Studies, which was held in Liverpool.  I would normally attend the conference in person but circumstances prevented it this year, so I was very grateful that the Guild had made it a hybrid event, with remote access to all of the talks, and specific Q&A sessions for the remote attendees, as well as several opportunities to 'get together' online. 

Management of the online presentations was also handed over to members in the USA during Saturday night/Sunday morning, which permitted more topics to be covered over the weekend. I still need to catch up with a few of the overnight talks but everything I have watched so far has been interesting and informative.

Given Liverpool's role as a "gateway" to the world, for so many people over the years, it's no surprise that the talks covered topics such as migration, specifically of the Irish, the Welsh, and those from northern Europe who passed through the port, maritime records, the slave trade, and the Liverpool Home Children.  Other talks connected to the area included the Liverpool court houses, the Lancashire cotton famine, and a potted history (with demonstrations) of clog dancing.

There were talks on topics such as DNA, and taking over, or passing on, a one-name study, as well as information about websites, such as Family Search, Name & Place, and FindMyPast.

In some ways, it is too early for me to write specifics from the talks (two & a half days of almost constant online does lead to feeling a bit "brain dead" ☺ ) but I thought I'd just highlight some of the things which particularly resonated with me during the event, as well as the initial follow-up that I have carried out.

"Internal migration" was one phrase - the fact that people often moved within their own countries, before they made a jump to another country.  Since my own ancestors did a fair amount of "border-hopping" between Herefordshire and the South Wales counties before, in some cases, going abroad, this struck me as something I should pay more attention to.  

This tied in neatly with the talk by Jen Baldwin, of FindMyPast, entitled "Telling their story is *our* story" with its emphasis on the fact that 'every story matters' - we're not just compiling names and dates etc (a habit it is easy to fall into, with a study of a relatively frequently occurring surname) but actually revealing the humanity of the people we write about, who they were, what they did and, where possible, the why of it, their hopes and their heartbreaks.  

Perhaps I was biased by the fact I was clearing a few items from my mending pile, while watching the conference, but I wrote down two phrases that particularly stood out - "the rich tapestry of lives" and, from a different talk, "mending torn fabric."  Again, they relate to filling in more about the people themselves, rather than just recording facts and figures.

Another talk I found thought provoking was Wayne Shepheard's, concerning the relevance of environmental factors, ie "Mother Nature", on people's decision to migrate.  In the past, I've often tended to focus on economic, or family and health related reasons for movement, so it was good to be reminded to consider other issues.

There are two specific sites that I have so far looked up, as a result of the conference.  The first one is the Slave Voyages site at https://www.slavevoyages.org

There are several reasons why I followed this one up. I knew that there were a few Parrys who received compensation after the abolishment of slavery.  Some years ago, I was also in touch with a Parry descendant who thought his ancestors had owned objects that might have had an African origin - but he'd never researched where the objects came from, or how his family had obtained them. Thirdly, from a book of Will abstracts, I know that a Parry was one time governor of Barbados. And finally, many years ago, I'd carried out research into a Parry family who used the middle name of "Colston" over many generations - potentially this might have been the maiden name of a wife in the late 1700s but, in 2020, when the statue of Edward Colston, a slave trader, was toppled into Bristol harbour, I did wonder whether there might have been some connection to him instead. 

Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be an easy way to search the whole site for any Parrys.  I did do a quick search on google using '"parry" "slavevoyages.org"', which indicates there's probably ten pages on the site with a Parry mentioned, as well as numerous other sites containing both search terms. 

So this is a topic I need to spend more time investigating.

The second site I've looked at is the 1950 census on FamilySearch.  This was because Taneya Koonce mentioned in her talk on researching black family history that "race" was shown as a category in that census, and I wondered what that might reveal about any Parrys.

As you can see from the following image, it is possible to filter the 6,888 Parrys in the census by various racial terms which were in use in the 1950s - along with some other, rather puzzling, terms (eg "74", "2", "U" etc).


So far, I have only checked a few of the lowest numbered entries and it turned out many of those are errors, for example the "74" relates to an entry with no-one at home, which says "see sheet 74", the 74 just happening to be written in the column where race would be recorded.

Clearly there's a lot of work that needs to be done to correct the transcriptions, before one can even identify the relevant people, yet alone think of trying to write their stories. 

But, just to sum up, I found the whole conference enjoyable and think it was a great idea to make it a hybrid event.  Whilst there were a few technical (or administrative) issues, such as talks beginning before the remote broadcast time, or no-one knowing the separate password that was required to get into the Q&A sessions, in general everything seemed to run smoothly. 

So, even though I will try to attend in person next time, I do hope the Guild will continue to use this format in the future, for the benefit of those members, throughout the world, who are unable to do so. 


Notes

Centre for the Study of the Legacies of British Slavery. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs/

The story of the statue of Edward Colston: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statue_of_Edward_Colston

Family Search 1950 census: https://www.familysearch.org/en/search/collection/4464515

Monday, March 31, 2025

March update and collecting statistics

 I've been carrying out research on several 'non-PARRY' branches of my own family during this past month, and there's been very little progress specifically about PARRYs, or for the wider One-Name Study, so this will be quite a short update.

On the 15th March, I attended the Malvern Family History Show.  It was lovely to catch up with numerous members of the Guild of One-Name Studies, who were either there helping with the Guild stand, or on other family history society stands, presenting talks, or just having a day out, as I was.  

But I didn't take any photos, not even the lovely view of the hills in the sunshine, as we queued just before the show opened, which I now regret!

One of the aims of a One-Name Study is to develop "added value", going beyond the stories of individual families, in order to draw conclusions about the surname itself1. One topic that I had hoped to write about this month concerns the frequency and distribution of the PARRY surname in British censuses.  Back in 2005, when my web site was still available, I had collected some preliminary information relating to the numbers of PARRYs in the censuses from 1851 - 1901, and created the following image, giving some indication of how the surname distribution had changed over those years: 



I'd also produced an attempt at mapping a modern (2002) distribution of the surname, which is available on the PARRY study profile, at https://one-name.org/name_profile/parry/ .

In the years since those were produced, the data for the other British censuses (1841, 1911, and 1921), as well as for the 1939 Register, has become available, and I have made a start on collecting the information from those, so that I can produce a more complete sequence of map images.

But things are never simple, are they?

One would think that it should be a fairly straightforward task, to do an exact search for the surname PARRY in the various genealogical databases, obtain totals per county, and then create the maps.  

But, no, it isn't!

I knew there was likely to be some differences between the totals provided by different companies - it is rare that they have been able to use data for a census that has already been transcribed.  So they have all undertaken their own transcription process, and therefore show differences due to the way the surname has sometimes been transcribed.  

Even if they had been able to use an 'already transcribed' dataset, as might have been possible with the 1881 census, which was initially transcribed in a joint project between the Federation of Family History Societies (now the Family History Federation), and the Genealogical Society of Utah, over the years, as users submit corrections to whichever company they might have searched in, the datasets would develop differences. (Although one might hope that this would eventually lead to a coalescing of the totals, as all the mistakes get picked up and corrected.)

But when you discover that the individual county totals from a particular company, when added together, don't even match the overall total that company shows for the census, then you realise a lot more work is going to be needed to obtain even moderately accurate figures!

I think some of the issues are to do with registration districts that overlap county boundaries, and therefore get included within both individual counties.  There are also variations in how the companies treat individual counties (for example, why does TheGenealogist lump Huntingdonshire and Rutland figures together?  They might be small counties, but they don't even border on each other.) 

Clearly, I need to do a lot more investigation before I can draw any conclusions, and post some updated distribution maps.

Notes and Sources
1. About One-Name Studies: https://one-name.org/one-name-studies/

Friday, February 21, 2025

Parry Postcards

 I had a nice surprise last year, when I was contacted by Colin Buck.  Back in the 1990s, Colin had created "The Postcard Index", with the simple idea of purchasing postcards from dealers, indexing them, and then, by advertising the Index, passing the cards on to people with an interest in the names.  Over the years, it seems many One-Namers (and no doubt other researchers, as well), benefitted from Colin's work.  But Colin told me that he was no longer collecting the cards, and was keen to pass on as many as possible, of those that he still held, to interested parties.

And so it was that, just a little while later, I gratefully received thirty nine postcards, which had been sent to people with the surname PARRY.

I'm looking forward to carrying out some research on the people the cards were sent to, but haven't yet decided on the most appropriate way of posting the information here.  To some extent, that will depend on what I can find out when I research them.

However, I thought I'd start with just a quick summary of the cards.

As one might expect, all were sent to UK addresses - twenty-one of the cards were sent to addresses in England, seventeen to Wales and one to Scotland.  Four of the addresses appear more than once.  

Thirty four of the cards show pictures of places.  Of these, the majority, eighteen, are places in England, six are in Wales, five in France, and then there's one each from Scotland, Germany, Jersey, Italy and California (this last one posted in England).

The following table shows the numbers of cards for various combinations of "picture country" to "destination country":


Of the five cards that did not have pictures of places, two were sending birthday wishes and one sending New Year wishes.  The final two?  Well, I imagine there's an interesting story behind each of them, but I'll let you make up your own minds as to what that might be (and no, I haven't tried the dumpling recipe.☺):







I will be posting more about the postcards over the coming months. Colin also kindly sent me a list of the cards relating to PARRYs that he no longer held.  Even though I don't know what was on the cards, it will still be of interest to follow up on the addresses that they were sent to.

Okay, I couldn't resist doing a little bit of research on the two posted above:

Regarding the first image, in 1851, there is a PARRY family living in a house called "Prysmawr" in Llanuwchlyn, Merionethshire, (a widowed Ann, with children Robert, aged 8, and Jane, aged 5).  However, they aren't in the property in the following censuses.  But, in the 1901 census, when a DAVIES family live there, there is a Thomas PARRY, aged 28, appearing as the farm bailiff.  This is possibly the Thomas PARRY who appears in the 1881, and the 1891, censuses for Llanuwchlyn, as one of the grandchildren of an Ellen JONES, living in a house called Wern. It is possible Thomas (aged 28 in the 1901 census, and already a widower), then remarries in 1901 to a Catherine EVANS, and they appear with their children in the 1911 and 1921 censuses, and then finally, just as a couple, in the 1939 Register, still in Llanuwchlyn.  In 1911, they are living in a house called "Penrhiw", and in 1921 and 1939, they are living in a house called "Llys Arthur".  But, since the postcard seems to be dated 1920, if it is the correct family, they potentially lived at "Prys" between these other two properties.

The second postcard is dated 1909.  Although there are PARRYs in Grimsbury at a later date (1921), no PARRYs appear to be associated with the Causeway.  However, intriguingly, an Edward Thomas PARRY marries an Alice May CAISBROOK in Banbury RD (which covers Grimsbury), in 1915. Alice was living in Merton Street, Grimsbury, in 1911, with her mother and siblings.  Alice and Edward PARRY are the PARRYs in Grimsbury in 1921. Edward, born about 1881 in Corwen, Merionethshire, was an engine driver for the Great Western railway in 1921.  He previously appeared as an railway engine stoker, boarding in Shrewsbury in 1901, and as a railway fireman, boarding in Brentford, Middlesex, in 1911. So potentially he might have been boarding in Grimsbury in 1909.  Perhaps there was just a little bit of "disguise" in the postcard, through the re-arrangement of their initials?


Notes and Sources
(To follow)



Sunday, January 26, 2025

The 'sons of Harry' surnames

I've been reminded recently of how 'complicated' surname studies can be.  

At the end of last year, one of the Guild members posted that the Kindle version of the "Oxford Dictionary of Family Names in Britain and Ireland" was available free of charge to people in the UK, so I took advantage of this and downloaded it.1

Obviously, I began by looking up PARRY.  No major surprises in the entry - although it is interesting to note that the frequency of the surname appears to be reducing, with only 27,276 PARRYs shown for Great Britain in 2011, as opposed to the 35,614 that were shown in the Taliesin-arlein database in 2002.2 Even adjusting the figures in the Taliesin-arlein database, as was recommended in order to obtain a better estimate of the number of living PARRYs at that time, by allowing for potentially duplicated entries, deaths not yet removed, etc, only brought that 2002 figure down to 33,121. 

Clearly, the surname is not yet in danger of "extinction", but it is an intriguing reduction, nevertheless.

Both the distribution information - "widespread in Wales and England: esp. Lancs and N. Wales" - and the suggested origins - "Welsh: relationship name from ap Harry 'son of Harry'" - are as I would expect.

The list of early bearers has some interesting individuals, since one of the earliest entries is given as a Thomas Parrye, who appears in the 1377 Poll Tax for Birdforth, in North Yorkshire.  

I wonder who he was, since that's not exactly a PARRY hotspot!

As well as that reference from 1377 with the spelling as Parrye, there are several other variations to the spelling among the list of early bearers.  These include 'ap Harry', as would be expected, but also Apharry, Upharry, Aperry, Parrey, and Parey. While these might have been consistently used as surnames at the time, if I came across them in modern day records, I would suspect they were just a 'deviant' spelling, as those versions are no longer in common use.3

But it was the comment in the Dictionary to "Compare HARRY" that reminded me of just how complicated surname studies can be - and the fact that I really must try to resurrect my web pages this year!

Back in 2006, I was planning a web page about why not every "son of Harry" became a "Parry" in Wales.  In it, I commented on the changes to the patronymic system over the years, ie from the initial use of the terms ap or ab, meaning 'son of' (which led to the surname Parry, as the 'ap' and 'Harry' became combined), the subsequent loss of those terms between the names, despite maintenance of the patronymic system (which resulted in the surname 'Harry'), and how this was followed later by the addition of the possessive ending 's, ie "Harry's son", leading to surnames such as Harris, and Harries.  These changes combined with the adoption of fixed surnames, which occurred at different times, in different places, (and was also affected by a family's status and involvement with the English), to result in several different surnames, across the country, which all derive from the personal name, Harry.

One of the aims of a One-Name Study is to consider the origins of the surname, and its relevant variants.  Since Harry is a common form of Henry, the factors mentioned above also produced a variety of surnames based on that name. And, when one includes the Anglo-Norman use of the term 'fitz', which also means 'son of', from which surnames such as Fitzharris and Fitzhenry developed, one realises that it's not easy to produce a 'simple' summary of the 'sons of Harry' surnames!


Notes and References
1 "Oxford Dictionary of Family Names in Britain and Ireland," 1st Edition, Kindle Edition
by Patrick Hanks (Editor), Richard Coates (Editor), Peter McClure (Editor)  https://www.amazon.co.uk/Oxford-Dictionary-Family-Britain-Ireland-ebook/dp/B01N41TEO3/ref=sr_1_1?
2 The Taliesin-arlein database held figures on the frequency of surnames in England and Wales based on information from the Office of National Statistics as at September 2002.  Unfortunately, although the base domain still exists (https://www.taliesin-arlein.net/), the link to the Surnames of England and Wales no longer works.
3 For information about the difference between surname variants and surname deviants see the Guild page at 
https://one-name.org/variants-and-deviants/


Monday, January 06, 2025

Conclusions from the Guild Blog Challenge 2024

 Having taken part in the Guild Blog Challenge that ran over the last five months of 2024, I thought it might be a good idea to review how things went, particularly picking up on some of the issues that I mentioned in my first post for the Challenge.1

Frequency of posts

The aim was to produce at least one blog post a month, based on topics suggested by Melody McKay Burton, who set up the Challenge for us, following requests at a Guild Seminar.  I didn't succeed in sticking to the timescale - my first post was early, my second and fifth were on time (just!), but the third and fourth were both late. However, I did at least manage to write five posts. So that's a small success, because I didn't let the failure to post during October discourage me from continuing.

Correspondents

I'd expressed concern about the 'trade-off' in time, between communicating with others about the study as opposed to just getting on with the research, and about how difficult it can be to get the balance right.  The one comment I did receive on the blog, which aided my own understanding of an issue, was much appreciated. But, since I only notified the Challenge Group about my posts, I managed to avoid the issue of 'too much communication,' which might have arisen if I had publicised the posts more widely.

So this balance is still an issue I need to be mindful of in the future (especially since I did find myself getting a bit sidetracked trying to help a researcher who contacted me in November, regarding Parry ancestors that emigrated to the United States, potentially from North Wales - there are a lot of Parrys in North Wales!)

Content and Prompts

Pretty much in line with what I'd written before, I found that having the prompts for each month was useful in ensuring I attempted to write something - but some of the prompts were also almost 'stumbling blocks'. "Similarities and Differences" was one such topic, because I didn't think I knew enough about any particular individuals, or families, in the study, in order to do the detailed analysis that I considered would best fit the topic. This accounted for why October's post was so late, and why the post ended up as the wider overview of the "Parry vs Perry" surname.

How to overcome that?  Perhaps the key, at least for me, is to separate out the 'challenge' from the 'prompts'.  Having a challenge is an incentive - so my pact with myself, for the future, is that I will continue to try to write at least one post each month.  But, in order to keep the usefulness of prompts, without the possibility of stumbling blocks, I am going to give myself a choice - I am going to create a list of topics (probably based on those of past Guild challenges, and other genealogy blog series, such as the "52 ancestors" 2) so that I have a range of topics to choose from each time, with the proviso that I can't write about the same topic twice.

Organisation

I don't think the Challenge made any difference to this - it merely highlighted the fact that I'm still not as organised as I need to be, to make the study as good as it could be!
 

Final thoughts - Motivation

Well, I definitely feel more motivated to keep on posting, so that's progress!  

The Challenge didn't just provide an incentive to get blogging again, but it also reminded me of how much I enjoy researching the PARRYs, and passing on the results of that research.  So it has provided an answer to the question I posed - "Why am I writing this blog?"

It might seem strange to say that one conclusion from the Challenge is that I am going to be a bit more "selfish".  But, if research into family history, and the PARRY One-Name Study, really are the priorities for me that I want them to be, because I enjoy them, then that should be reflected in the time I put into them.  

So, rather than allowing myself to get involved with things that are often to achieve other people's (or organisation's) priorities, I'm going to aim to follow the advice of a well-known genealogist - "life is short – do genealogy first!"3

(And, finally, thank you to Melody for organising the Challenge - you doing so has made a difference!)


Notes and References

2. Amy Johnson Crow's "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks": This is a link to sign up for the current series
https://www.amyjohnsoncrow.com/52-ancestors-in-52-weeks-new/ but many of the topics from previous years can easily be found by searching online. 

3. "Life is short – do genealogy first!": Geoff Rasmussen of Legacy Family Tree Webinars, 



















Tuesday, December 31, 2024

December - Celebrations

The topic for December's Guild Blog Challenge is "Celebrations" and, while Christmas, or other such 'happy' occasions, might have been an obvious subject for this post, I'm going "off-piste" again (and tissues may be required.)   

I was inspired to write this (perhaps "moved" might be a better word) after coming across a newspaper report of an inquest into the death of a William PARRY.  William was a discharged soldier, who had been found in an archway near Bath in a state of starvation and who later died in hospital. 

We often describe someone’s funeral as a "celebration of life,” and I couldn’t get that phrase out of my mind - hence my choice for this month's topic. 

The Discovery

The case was widely reported during November 1919.  One of the earliest references, in the Western Daily Press of 5th November 1919, was headed "Helpless and Starving. Without food for a fortnight":

William Parry, aged 44, a discharged soldier, of no home, was found yesterday morning in a terrible state in one of the arches of Newton Bridge1, near Bath. Parry, who could hardly speak, said he crawled into the place for shelter on October 18 and had been unable to move owing to weakness; he had, had no food since then. Parry looked 74 when discovered. He was taken to hospital.

A 'page filler' underneath the article indicated that heavy snowstorms were falling in France. Searching online revealed that England and Wales were also experiencing very cold weather at this time, with some snow in September, a "prolonged frosty spell" during October, and a " remarkably cold" November 1919.2

More details of William’s situation, and his history, emerged in reports published over the next few days: William had been discovered at 11 o'clock Tuesday, by a roadman, Richard Bush (whose address was mentioned, as well as the fact that Richard was employed by the Bath Corporation).  Richard had heard faint moaning.  The roadman called the Twerton police and PCs Marshall and Crouch were dispatched to the spot, where they found William among the debris under the smaller arches on the city side of the Avon.  He was in a “pitiable condition”, unable to speak above a whisper, and looked like a hermit, with a long growth of beard. He said he had no friends or relatives.  His feet were wrapped in hay bands - he’d served two years in France, where he’d suffered from trench foot, which had been treated in hospital. Following discharge he’d tramped the country but the trouble with his feet had come back after he’d set out from Bristol.  

He'd crawled in to the arch, which was partly filled with debris and, owing to sickness and weakness, had been unable to get out again. He’d taken his boots off to ease his feet but couldn’t get them back on, as his feet were so swollen. He’d been under the arch for seventeen days. He was a mere skeleton when found. William was taken to Bath hospital, in the Bath Fire Brigade Ambulance in the charge of Chief Officer England. He’d been examined by the house surgeon, a Dr Cuppage, and his condition was critical.

Although William seems to have rallied at first, he then developed pneumonia.  The first reports of his death appeared on the 18th November, the day that he died.

The Inquest

An inquest was held on the 20th November and the most detailed report seems to be in the Bath Chronicle of the 22nd:

The Newton Bridge Mystery

Pathetic Inquest Story

“One of England’s lonely soldiers”

Found dying under an arch

Long tramp in search of work

Wandering of a wounded hero

Military Honours tomorrow

The Coroner’s inquiry into the death of William Parry (44), the ex-soldier who was found lying exhausted under one of the arches of Newton Bridge just a fortnight ago, was held at the Bath Guildhall on Thursday afternoon. Parry was described as a seaman, and his address was given as 36, Catherine Street, Exeter. His death occurred at the Royal United Hospital, Bath, early on Tuesday morning.

“Sounds of Moaning”

P.C. Marshall, of the Bath Police Force, stationed at Twerton, said he was called to the Newton Bridge at 11.15 a.m. on November 4th by Richard Bush, a roadman, who told him there was something amiss in one of the arches. Witness went with Bush to the waterside, and heard “a moaning noise.” The sound evidently came from one of the arches, which was partly filled with stones and rubbish. Witness called “What’s the matter?” And a voice replied “I can’t get out; my feet are so bad.” Witness removed his helmet and coat and crawled into the arch over the stones. He then struck a match and found the deceased lying on his back on some hay. He asked how long he had been there, and Parry replied, “What month is it now?” When witness told him it was now November, Parry said he had been in the arch since October 18th. Witness sent P.C. Crouch to call the Bath Fire Brigade ambulance, which arrived in about 15 minutes. In the meantime he had a further conversation with the deceased, who said he had no friends and no fixed abode. Further questioned, he said he could not say how long he had been in the arch.   

“Tramped from Bristol”

Parry said he was born in Swansea, had served in the 2nd Devons, and was demobilised in Exeter last March. He got into the arch because his feet were aching. He had come from Bristol. He did not say where he was going.

The coroner remarked that it must have been a lot of trouble for Parry to get into the position in which he was found. Witness said he would have had to crawl into the cavity, over the stones, but once inside there was plenty of room.

Dr Burke Cuppage, house physician at the Royal United Hospital said Parry on admission was very emaciated and suffering from “trench feet.” He made no statement on admission. Pneumonia supervened on November 12th, and from this he did not recover. Witness had made a post-mortem examination, but found no special features about the case. There were no marks of emaciation; but this was not surprising, he added in reply to the Coroner, as he had had good food while in hospital. This witness emphatically agreed with the Coroner that it was highly improbable that Parry had been lying in the archway since October 18th. He improved when first admitted to the hospital.

“Gifts from sympathetic ladies”

The Coroner’s Officer (Inspector Lovell) produced an inventory of Parry’s belongings. These included a ration book, issued to him for the address in Exeter, his insurance card, and his out-of-work book. Parry had 10s. 8d, in cash on him; but 10s. 6d. of this sum was given him by a lady since his arrival at the hospital. Parry had received various other gifts sent him by ladies from all over the country, who had read the account of his discovery in the Press.  The last out-of-work donation received by him was on June 26th, and the ration book was issued at Exeter on March 24th. The address at Catherine Street, Exeter, at which Parry had stayed was that of a Church Army Home. He had also with him a card indicating membership of the Comrades of the Great War. The entries on his insurance card showed he was last employed on September 8th.

“Twenty-two years a seaman”

Inspector Lovell then gave the Coroner the result of exhaustive enquiries which he had made since Tuesday regarding Parry’s antecedents. He had communicated with the police at Exeter and at Teignmouth. By the Exeter police he was informed that Parry registered at the Labour Exchange there as a seaman on March 25th. He then produced his certificate showing him to be a member of the Mercantile Marine. He had apparently served as a seaman for 22 years. He subsequently served with the 2nd Battalion of the Devon Regiment for 2 1/2 years. On May 16th, 1919 he obtained work as a painter in Exeter. He retained this employment till June 21st. A week later he obtained similar employment with another Exeter firm at 1s. 3d. an hour, and his earnings averaged £2 or more a week. He left the Church Army Home on September 12th, explaining he was going to Barrow-in-Furness, where he expected to obtain employment with Messrs Vickers, Sons, and Maxim. While staying at the Church Army Home he appeared to have been regarded as of a morbid disposition. Witness also produced a report from the Devon Constabulary of Teignmouth which corroborated the statement of the Exeter police in certain particulars. So far, said Inspector Lovell, he had been unable to verify the statement that Parry was born in Swansea, or to enquire into his intended journey to Barrow-in-Furness, as time had not permitted.

“Letter from friend at Exeter”

Inspector Lovell added that the members of the Exeter branch of the Comrades of the Great War had assisted him in the matter, and he was able to furnish the court with a letter from Mr F W Drew, with whom Parry had lodged at the Church Army Home. The writer said he met Parry in the latter part of April, and their friendship lasted until ten weeks ago, when deceased left Exeter. As they were two ex-servicemen they became intimate friends. Parry was reticent concerning his friends, but apparently before the war he belonged to London.

“A Prisoner in Germany”

After enlistment he had served in France, and was taken prisoner by the Germans. He was in their hands for three months; and acted as interpreter between his captors and the other British prisoners. He could speak German and other foreign languages, and undoubtedly was a man of superior education. Apparently, however, so far as his relations were concerned, he was “one of England’s lonely soldiers.” He said he was badly treated by the Germans, and suffered from a bad cough, the result of a wound in the chest. He was liable to depression when out of work, and the writer well remembered how pleased he was to think that he had obtained work at Barrow-in-Furness - as he understood, in an aircraft department. “I deeply regret” concluded the writer, “that he has come to such an untimely end. He was a good fellow, and would do anyone a good turn, if possible.”

Inspector Lovell produced additional particulars concerning Parry from the Record Office of the Devon Regiment.

The Coroner remarked that nothing was said concerning the manner in which Parry contrived to escape from the Germans.

“The Coroner Sums Up”

In summing up, the Coroner remarked that exhaustive enquiries had been made into the case. There was no doubt from the medical evidence that the cause of death was pneumonia. It would appear that Parry had been on the road for some time when he crawled under the arch where he was found; but he must have made some mistake in telling the constable he had been there since October 18th.

The jury found that death was due to pneumonia.

“A Military Funeral”

Mr G Dudley, the local secretary of the Bath branch of the British Federation of Discharged Soldiers and Sailors, said arrangements were being jointly made by his organisation and the Comrades of the Great War (represented at that inquiry by the secretary, Mr E G Snell) for Parry to receive a military funeral. It was hoped to obtain a grant towards the expenses from the local War Pensions Committee.

The Coroner cordially approved this suggestion.

Inspector Lovell thanked the local members of the Federation, and also Mr Snell, of the Comrades’ Association, for their kindly interest.

The arrangements for the funeral are already practically complete. The funeral procession will leave the Royal United Hospital at one o’clock on Saturday; and the internment will be in St. James’s Cemetery at 1.30.


The report of the inquest in the Yorkshire Evening Post drew attention to the “mystery” of William’s identity, given the contents of Mr Drew’s letter, in contrast to William’s stated birthplace of Swansea. 

And, unfortunately, that mystery still remains.

William’s death was registered on the 25th November 1919, following the Coroner’s Inquest. As might be expected, the certificate details matches the information given at the inquest:




There is an entry for William’s grave in the record set “ Commonwealth War Graves Commission Debt Of Honour” on FindMyPast, which gives his number in the Devonshire Regiment as 33812.
Details on the CWGC site include grave registration report forms, but only confirms the information about William known from the sources above.
With his number, it becomes possible to identify his medal card and the associated entry in the medal rolls, on Ancestry:



Based on information from the Long Long Trail, and the associated Great War Forum3, the reference on the medal card (c2/103 B17 1221) is the reference to the relevant medal roll for the Devonshire Regiment



(expanded view of the red text relating to William)

The additional references on the medal card, and the red text on the medal roll relate to the two medals having been returned.4

The fact that the medals were recorded as "returned" might indicate that they were sent out somewhere when first issued - unfortunately, William's service record, which might have shown his address on enlistment, no longer seems to exist, as I was unable to find anything in either the British Army WW1 Service Records, or the Pension Records 1914-1920 (the "Burnt" and "Unburnt" Records.) 

As well as demonstrating that William was entitled to both the Victory Medal and the British War Medal, the medal records show that he had two previous service numbers, 41594 (in the 12th Devonshire) and 90950 (in the 152 Labour Corps). It was quite common for soldiers to be moved between different battalions or regiments during the First World War and this sequence does seem to fit in with the history of the Devonshire Regiment, as shown on https://www.longlongtrail.co.uk/army/regiments-and-corps/the-british-infantry-regiments-of-1914-1918/devonshire-regiment/ where the 12th (Labour) Battalion became the 152nd and 153rd Labour Companies in April 1917. Given the general level of casualties during WW1, it is not difficult to imagine that, at some stage after that, William was transferred into the regular 2nd Devons. 


The War Diary, "The 2nd Battalion Devonshire Regiment and its lost men 1914-1919" can be found at https://archive.org/details/2ndbattaliondevo0000body/mode/2up although there is no reference to William Parry in it.


The 2nd Devons took part in the battle of Bois des Buttes5, in which many of them were either killed or captured - perhaps that was when William became a prisoner of war?


There is an entry for him in the “ British Red Cross & Order Of St John Enquiry List, Wounded & Missing, 1914-1919” record set on FindMyPast. However, I have been unable to find a relevant Red Cross “Prisoner of War” record on the site at https://grandeguerre.icrc.org/en/ .


So I have found no further information about his military service, his time as a prisoner of war, whether he was released or escaped (as the inquest seemed to indicate.) Neither have I found any details for his time in the 'mercantile marines.6

And, unfortunately, without further information, it is currently not possible to identify William in records such as the censuses or birth indexes, because of the frequency of the names.


The Funeral

William’s funeral was reported in detail in the Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette dated 29th November 1919. The front page carried a photograph at the graveside, where there was a large gathering of ex-servicemen. Page 2 carried four photographs - the cortège arriving at St James’s Cemetery, a different photograph of the large gathering at the graveside, the procession leaving the Chapel for the grave, and the open hearse, on which rested the coffin, draped with the Union Jack. Page 16 then included a write-up of the funeral:


“Lonely Soldier’s Funeral”

Last rites at St James’s Cemetery

The final scene in the tragedy associated with William Parry, the ex-soldier who was found lying exhausted under one of the arches of Newton Bridge, a fortnight ago, and who succumbed at the Royal United Hospital, as the outcome of exposure and privation, took place on Saturday, when his remains were buried in St James’s Cemetery. the Rev. J. O. Evans (curate of St. James’s) officiated.

This “lonely soldier” was not permitted to pass unattended or unhonoured to his last rest. from the hospital entrance to the grave-side he was followed by a large muster of ex-Service men. There were no private mourners, and the only vehicle in the procession was the open hearse, on which rested the coffin, draped with the Union Jack. On this hero’s pall lay several wreaths, including a token from an anonymous lady donor, and garlands from the two local organisations for the relief and assistance of discharged soldiers.

There was no band, and the only music was that of the measured tramp of the feet of the following comrades, led by the ties of fellowship and kindred suffering, to pay this last honour to one whom they had never seen. Thus through lines of sympathetic by-standers, the funeral train moved on. There was another large attendance at the cemetery.

The coffin was born by six soldiers- Private R W Carey, of the 1st Hants; Lance-Corporal E L Higgins, of the 1st Devon’s (who represented Parry’s old regiment); Private G Oakes, Machine Gun Corps; Bombadier J Kelson, R.G.A. (Mountain Battery); Sapper B Gunter, 1st Wessex Field Company, R.E.; and Private J Kelson, 2nd/4th Somerset L.I.

Members of the Comrades of the Great War and of the British Federation of Discharged Soldiers and Sailors were well represented. These organisations had jointly made arrangements for the funeral. In the absence of the Deputy-Chairman (Sergeant-Major Hills), the Somerset Division of the Comrades was represented by Sergeant A J Berry. Mr E G Snell, the local secretary of the Comrades, was unavoidably absent, and was represented by Mr J H Tacker. Mr H Baker (a member of the committee) was also present, and Mr Hodgson (of the Broadstairs branch), who happened to be in Bath, attended, and sent some flowers. R.Q.M. J J Barry was also present.

The British Federation was represented by Messrs F Dangerfield (chairman), F Salmon (vice-chairman), G Dudley (secretary), and J Phillips (one of the committee). Mrs Briscoe represented the widows and dependents’ section. Others present included Mr G Withers (late 4th Devon’s).

After the ceremony the “Last Post” was sounded by the Buglers G. And B. Comm, of the 1st/44th and 4th Somerset L.I.

The funeral arrangements were conducted by Mr A E Tanner, of 6 Monmouth Street.

P S Maynard had charge of the police arrangements at the cemetery.


And so the “final scene” of William’s life took place, the ‘celebration’ of a man honoured after his death, but seemingly alone and neglected before that.

In conclusion
In 1919, it had been suggested that those soldiers mentioned in dispatches should have permission to wear a small oak leaf on the ribbon of the Victory Medal. And, in the Daily Herald, 22nd November 1919, the following poem appeared:   

The Song of the Leaves

Eighty thousand oak-leaves,
Leaves in hordes and batches
Oak-leaves for the heroes
Mentioned in Dispatches.

Eighty thousand oak-leaves,
As well as stars and crosses,
To keep our memories evergreen
And help us bear our losses.

Eighty thousand oak-leaves!
We learned when we were younger
How robins covered up with leaves
Babes who died of hunger.

Eighty thousand oak-leaves
Won on dangerous marches
To cover William Parry up,
Who starved in Newton Arches.


Notes and References

1. The Newton Bridge and its arches:

2. The weather in 1919: 

3. The Long Trail:

4. Medal Card & Roll text interpretation:
Possible red text "BW&V Meds Retd CRV 525B d/22.6.23 KR 1743. Auth 7998/adt"
BW&V = British War and Victory Medals
CRV = Certified Receipt Voucher"
KR 1743 = Kings Regulations 1743
Sources


Potential Distances William walked or intended to walk:
Exeter to Barrow in Furness: about 320 miles
Exeter to Bristol: About 75 miles
Bristol to the Newton Bridge: About 10 miles

Current (2022-23) Number of homeless UK ex-servicemen 
"2,110 households with someone who served in the armed forces were assessed as homeless in 2022-23, according to figures from the Department of Housing, up from 1,850 last year.
Source