Howard Lewis PARRY is listed in both the "Battle Of Trafalgar Prize Book" (as "Howd L") and in the "British Royal Navy, Battle Of Trafalgar 1805" databases on FindMyPast (FMP) but, as I mentioned in my post about the PARRYs at the Battle of Trafalgar, I decided to write a separate post about him, since I have been able to find a reasonable quantity of additional information. Fortunately, because "Howard" isn't a very common PARRY first name, and he also has a second forename, it is relatively easy to identify many of the entries for him in the records (although care is needed for any entries just identified by rank - there were several PARRYs who were Lieutenants in the navy around the same time as Howard.)
So why does the site recognise the correct county (Kent) on the profiles, but not in the index entries?
A puzzle that I am not going to sidetrack to investigate, but am just highlighting, because issues like this could be misleading, and potentially result in researchers ignoring family trees that might prove helpful to them.
On with Howard's story - According to the TNA "Trafalgar Ancestors" project1, at the time of the battle, Howard was aged 14, and serving as a boy on HMS Tonnant. His birthplace is recorded as "Chatham, in Kent."
Since I was initially using FMP, it was only after I'd collected the results from there, that I then searched on Ancestry, where I found him listed in the "British Naval Biographical Dictionary, 1849". This gives a good summary of his naval career, so I've transcribed the entry:
PARRY, (COMMANDER, 1832. F-P., 15: H-P., 29.)REFHoward Lewis Parry entered the Navy, 23 Aug. 1803, on board the NIOBE 40, Capt. Matthew Henry Scott, stationed in the Channel. He removed, in Dec. 1804, to the HIBERNIA 110; and he next, from Feb. 1805 until March 1806, served on the Home and Mediterranean stations in the TONNANT 80, Capt. Chas. Tyler. In Nov. 1809 he became Midshipman of the DOLPHIN 44, armee-en-flute, Capts. Christopher Watson and Alex. Milner, with whom he served until transferred, in Feb. 1811, to the GRASSHOPPER 18, Capt. Henry Fanshawe. In the following Dec. he was on board the latter vessel when, in order to avoid sharing the fate of the unfortunate HERO, she was under the necessity of surrendering to the Dutch fleet in the Texel. He was in consequence taken prisoner and detained in captivity until the peace of 1814. He then successively joined the AMPHION 32, Capt. Jas. Pattison Stewart, and PANDORA 16, Capts. Jas. Kearny White, Sam. Malbon, Wm. Popham, and Hon. Fred. Noel; and in those vessels we find him employed on the North American, West India, and Home stations, until presented, in Oct. 1815, with a commission bearing date 10 of the preceding March. His next appointments were - 10 Sept. 1825, to the RAMILLES 74, Coast Blockade ship, Capts. Wm. M'Culloch and Hugh Pigot - and, 22 July, 1831, to the Coast Guard. "For gallant conduct and severe wounds" received in the latter service he was advanced to his present rank 10 Feb. 1832. He has since been on half-pay.In consideration of his wounds Commander Parry was awarded, 19 April 1833, a pension of 91l. 5s. per annum. He is the senior Commander on the list of 1832. AGENTS- Hallett and Robinson
The reference to the "Tonnant" helps to confirm that this is the same man as is in the Trafalgar records.
The TNA site gave Chatham, in Kent, as Howard's birthplace, but, since he appears in the 1851 and 1861 censuses, a potentially more precise location is listed in them - "Finsbury, Kent", in the 1851 census, and "Frindsbury, Kent" in the 1861.2
A quick check of the Kent parishes on Genuki confirms that "Frindsbury" is a parish in that county, on the other side of the River Medway from Chatham, the site of the Royal Dockyard.3
Entries on FindMyPast confirm that Howard Lewis PARRY was baptised on the 18th March 1792, in Frindsbury, All Saints Church. His parents were another Howard, and Ann. Although there are no images for this on the FMP site, there is a link to the parish records on the Medway City Ark site, from which it appears Howard was born on the 22nd February.4
When Howard joined the navy, in 1803, he would have been aged just eleven - which I gather was reasonably typical for the period.5
By the time of the battle of Trafalgar, Howard was on his third ship, the Tonnant, which is one of those listed in the Trafalgar prize books. So we know that he received £1 17s 6d from the prize money on the 25 June 1807. He also received £4 12s 6d as his share of the Parliamentary Grant - although FMP have the date for the Grant money as 5 Sep 1807, the image shows 8 September 1806, and online sources do indicate that the Grant was awarded first, in September 1806, whereas the Prize money was announced in March 1807.
On the 19th April 1820, Howard married Elizabeth WILLIAMS, in Stoke Damerel, Devon, by licence.
[Note - I haven't found a death for this Elizabeth Ellen. However, there are two other baptisms for an Elizabeth Ellen, daughter of Howard Lewis and Elizabeth, one on the 21st May 1829, in Lydd, Kent, the other in Folkestone, Kent, on the 22nd May 1833, the same day that her sister, Evelina Ann, was baptised. In the 1851 census, Elizabeth Ellen is shown as 21, and born in Lydd, whereas Evelina Ann is shown as 19, and born in Rye, Sussex. So I suspect that the daughter baptised in 1823 died, the 1829 entry is the baptism for a second Elizabeth Ellen soon after she was born and that, having moved, the family had perhaps forgotten that she had already been baptised, and so she was baptised again, at the same time as her sister was baptised.]
There are several "Navy Lists" available on FMP. These tend to have multiple entries for each individual, for example, in 1827, when Howard appears on p24 with the date he became a Lieutenant (10th March 1815), and on p63, where he is listed as one of the "Sup. Lts" on the Ramillies, with a date of 16 February 1826. Later editions include the date Howard became a Commander (10th Feb 1832), as well as when he received a pension for wounds (19th April 1833). All of which fit in with the details given in the Biographical Dictionary.
In view of the number of entries in the Navy Lists on FMP, and the fact that many pages seem to be identical, I have not checked them all, although it is possible some of them might contain additional information about Howard.
The biography indicates that, after 1826, Howard served on the Ramilles, before transferring to the coast guard in 1831. However, there is an entry on FMP for a Lieut. Howard Lewis PARRY being discharged from the "Talavera" on the 28th April 1831, having entered that ship on the 22nd December 1830. Following up entries online, it appears that Captain Hugh PIGOT, who was Superintendent of the Coast Blockade, had initially been in command of Ramillies, but had then transferred to the Talavera, in September 1829.7
So it seems possible that Howard had also transferred between the two ships, in 1830.
The "Coast Blockade" was the Royal Navy's attempt to control the smuggling that was occurring, particularly along the coasts of Kent and Sussex. According to an article on the TNA8 the blockade merged with the coast guard in 1831. This potentially explains Howard Lewis PARRY being appointed to the coast guard. Several newspapers report his appointment (along with others), in July and August 1831.
There is an undated entry for "Lt. H.L. PARRY" in the record set "Coastguards 1801-1952", on FMP, which are described as "Nominal indexes to Registers of Nominations for Appointments" (ADM 175/97), indicating that he was nominated from Folkestone, and appointed to Camber Station.
(The case has nothing to do with PARRYs though - just a 'rabbit-hole' I went down!)
'A General Order issued at this time contains the following significant warning : "In consequence of the system adopted by the smugglers of appearing in armed bodies, the officers of stations are admonished to be present at these attacks, and are therefore to be on the alert from 9 p.m. to 4 a.m." Whereupon we find a Lieutenant Parry requesting to be superseded, "as his health will not admit of it." There was no room for valetudinarians in such a service.'
Having looked up the description, [valetudinarian: a person of a weak or sickly constitution especially : one whose chief concern is their own poor health,11] I didn't want it to be referring to Howard - but I suspect it did.
However, he was not replaced, and I think subsequent events demonstrated that his own health, and safety, was not his primary concern.
"...in December a General Order is issued to the coastguard notifying that the crew of the Camber Station has been awarded £10 each, besides the seizure share, and were to be promoted, for courageously supporting their officer, Lieutenant Parry (since promoted to Commander), during a desperate affray with armed smugglers on the night of February 1st last."
21st. - "The Amie, a Fishing Vessel belonging to St. Valery, was driven on shore tbis morning about a mile from this harbor, and is full of water. The Crew (30 in number) were saved by assistance of Lieut. Parry, of the Coast Guard (Who went off four times in his Galley) the Surveyor of the Customs, his Men, and others."
"A gold medal was the awarded to Lieut. Parry, of the coast guard, for saving the lives of 30 men, the crew of the French vessel L'Aimée, which ran on shore off Rye on the 21st November last. The ship had struck, and the sea rolling over her, when Lieut. Parry put off with some men, and by his continued exertions in four trips to the vessel brought 21 of the men on board. The sea ran then so high that further attempts were impracticable. By a running line, however, got on board, nine others were saved, after three hours' exertion." [Morning Advertiser 13th January 1832, as well as several other newspapers]
"RYE, Feb. 2.--(From a Correspondent.) —A desperate affray took place this morning, about one o'clock, between a party of smugglers, armed with guns, bludgeons, &c. consisting of nearly 200 men, and Lieut. Parry, Royal Navy, with a few of his men, near the Camber Station, about two miles from Rye harbour. Lieut. Parry received two slugs in his shoulder, and the head of a large nail, and one of his fingers was nearly shot off; three of his men were also badly wounded; one has two balls in his leg, which is to be amputated tomorrow. After they fell they were cruelly beaten by the smugglers about the head with the butts of their muskets. One of the smugglers was shot through the heart, but they carried away all their wounded; also all the tubs, except 26, which were taken, and also the boat. The slugs and the nail have been extracted, and it is hoped Lieut. Parry will do well." [Morning Herald (London) 06 February 1832]
"Desperate affray with the loss of lives.—On the 1st instant, the Coast Guard Station at Camber, near Rye, was a scene of the most desperate description.- Early in the evening, Lieut. Parry, commanding the station, received information that an attempt would be made to land a valuable cargo of spirits, silks, tea &c, on that night. Lieut. Parry arranged his crew in the most effective and judicious manner, and on the time approaching (high water) undauntedly, with two of his men, took the guard on the place where it was supposed the boat would land. At twelve o'clock he observed a large boat, deeply laden, pulling in through the surf which was then very heavy ; on the boat touching the beach the men jumped out, when she filled, and her cargo became a prey to the heavy sea which was then running. Lieut. Parry's whole aim being to secure the persons of the smugglcrs (six in number), he made a signal for his crew; finding themselves likely to be overpowered, the six men commenced a tremendous yell, crying out to their party,- "Are you going to leave us here to be taken?" when instantly between two and three hundred men sprung to the fall of the beach, between thirty and forty of whom were armed with long duck guns; two of the most daring approached Lieut. P., menaced him, and called on their party to fire, when one of them was instantly laid a corpse at Lieut. Parry's feet. A heavy firing now commenced on both sides, and the scene became truly terrific. Lieut. Parry fell, having received six balls in his shoulder, one in his arm and finger, and three of his men severely wounded in their thighs and head. Lieut. Parry rallied, and coming with his crew to the charge, compelled the desperate band to retreat, taking with them (as is usual) their dead and wounded, excepting one, who was left a corpse, with the boat and twenty-six tubs of foreign spirits, in possession of the Coast Guard men. Lieut. Parry, with his wounded men, were conveyed to a small cottage near, when Lieut. Morgan, of the adjoining station hastened to the spot, and had the wounded conveyed to their several homes, and the immediate attendance of Drs. Wilson and Night, of Rye, was procured, who, we are happy to say, have pronounced the wounds not fatal. Too much praise cannot be bestowed on Lieut. Parry, for his cool and courageous conduct, with that of his men.Six smugglers have since died, one of whom carried a bayonet off the field, run directly through his bowels; and we are informed, from undoubted authority, that between fifteen and twenty now lay in a precarious state, many having undergone amputation. An inquest was held the following day, on the body of the unfortunate smuggler who was shot, and a verdict accordingly returned. The Coroner, in summing up the evidence, expatiated in the most humane and feeling manner on the serious consequences attending such disgraceful and unlawful practices, and concluded by offering his best thanks for the prompt assistance rendered on the occasion by Lieut. Morgan, and we feel it due to this Officer, and Lieut. Harris, R.N. to say their attention to the wounded ever since, has been unremitting. The Honourable Board of Customs on receiving the intelligence, dispatched the Deputy Comptroller General and Solicitor for the Crown, round the neighbourhood of Rye and Hastings, to offer liberal rewards for the apprehension of the offenders, and to convey to Lieut. Parry and crew, the Hon. Boards high opinion of their meritorious conduct on the occasion. Lieut. Parry has been promoted to the rank of Commander for his gallantry on the occasion."
By April 1832, seven of the smugglers believed to have been involved in this incident, and two other incidents, during which two of the coast guard had been killed, as well as several severely injured, had been captured and were put on trial. But, despite various people admitting to having been involved in the smuggling, only the case against one of the smugglers seems to have reached the Old Bailey, and he was found not guilty.12
https://www.thebluejackets.co.uk/video/WhenJoinNavyBoySailorsRoyalNavy
6. Upnor in Frindsbury: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upnor
9. Jury's Gap Watch House: https://www.hastingshistory.net/features/hastings-coastguards-and-smugglers-chronicle
"Jew's Gut" is also mentioned in an Old Bailey case, at https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/t18210411-64, so it's not a fiction
11. Definition of valetudinarian: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/valetudinarian
12. Smuggling case at the Old Bailey: Old Bailey Proceedings Online (www.oldbaileyonline.org, version 9.0) May 1832. Trial of WILLIAM NOAKES (t18320517-21). Available at: https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/t18320517-21 (Accessed: 5th April 2026).
No comments:
Post a Comment